linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@au1.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] mm: remove x86-only restriction of movable_node
Date: Mon,  7 Nov 2016 17:44:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478562276-25539-3-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478562276-25539-1-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

In commit c5320926e370 ("mem-hotplug: introduce movable_node boot
option"), the memblock allocation direction is changed to bottom-up and
then back to top-down like this:

1. memblock_set_bottom_up(true), called by cmdline_parse_movable_node().
2. memblock_set_bottom_up(false), called by x86's numa_init().

Even though (1) occurs in generic mm code, it is wrapped by #ifdef
CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE, which depends on X86_64.

This means that when we extend CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE to non-x86 arches,
things will be unbalanced. (1) will happen for them, but (2) will not.

This toggle was added in the first place because x86 has a delay between
adding memblocks and marking them as hotpluggable. Since other arches do
this marking either immediately or not at all, they do not require the
bottom-up toggle.

So, resolve things by moving (1) from cmdline_parse_movable_node() to
x86's setup_arch(), immediately after the movable_node parameter has
been parsed.

Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/memory_hotplug.c                 | 20 --------------------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index 37babf9..adcccd5 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
 			that the amount of memory usable for all allocations
 			is not too small.
 
-	movable_node	[KNL,X86] Boot-time switch to enable the effects
+	movable_node	[KNL] Boot-time switch to enable the effects
 			of CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE=y. See mm/Kconfig for details.
 
 	MTD_Partition=	[MTD]
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 9c337b0..4cfba94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -985,6 +985,30 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 
 	parse_early_param();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+	/*
+	 * Memory used by the kernel cannot be hot-removed because Linux
+	 * cannot migrate the kernel pages. When memory hotplug is
+	 * enabled, we should prevent memblock from allocating memory
+	 * for the kernel.
+	 *
+	 * ACPI SRAT records all hotpluggable memory ranges. But before
+	 * SRAT is parsed, we don't know about it.
+	 *
+	 * The kernel image is loaded into memory at very early time. We
+	 * cannot prevent this anyway. So on NUMA system, we set any
+	 * node the kernel resides in as un-hotpluggable.
+	 *
+	 * Since on modern servers, one node could have double-digit
+	 * gigabytes memory, we can assume the memory around the kernel
+	 * image is also un-hotpluggable. So before SRAT is parsed, just
+	 * allocate memory near the kernel image to try the best to keep
+	 * the kernel away from hotpluggable memory.
+	 */
+	if (movable_node_is_enabled())
+		memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
+#endif
+
 	x86_report_nx();
 
 	/* after early param, so could get panic from serial */
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index cad4b91..e43142c1 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1727,26 +1727,6 @@ static bool can_offline_normal(struct zone *zone, unsigned long nr_pages)
 static int __init cmdline_parse_movable_node(char *p)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE
-	/*
-	 * Memory used by the kernel cannot be hot-removed because Linux
-	 * cannot migrate the kernel pages. When memory hotplug is
-	 * enabled, we should prevent memblock from allocating memory
-	 * for the kernel.
-	 *
-	 * ACPI SRAT records all hotpluggable memory ranges. But before
-	 * SRAT is parsed, we don't know about it.
-	 *
-	 * The kernel image is loaded into memory at very early time. We
-	 * cannot prevent this anyway. So on NUMA system, we set any
-	 * node the kernel resides in as un-hotpluggable.
-	 *
-	 * Since on modern servers, one node could have double-digit
-	 * gigabytes memory, we can assume the memory around the kernel
-	 * image is also un-hotpluggable. So before SRAT is parsed, just
-	 * allocate memory near the kernel image to try the best to keep
-	 * the kernel away from hotpluggable memory.
-	 */
-	memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
 	movable_node_enabled = true;
 #else
 	pr_warn("movable_node option not supported\n");
-- 
1.8.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-07 23:44 [PATCH v6 0/4] enable movable nodes on non-x86 configs Reza Arbab
2016-11-07 23:44 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] powerpc/mm: allow memory hotplug into a memoryless node Reza Arbab
2016-11-10  1:37   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-11-07 23:44 ` Reza Arbab [this message]
2016-11-07 23:44 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm: enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on non-x86 arches Reza Arbab
2016-11-07 23:44 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] of/fdt: mark hotpluggable memory Reza Arbab
2016-11-08  1:59   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-08 19:59     ` Reza Arbab
2016-11-09 18:12   ` Rob Herring
2016-11-09 20:15     ` Reza Arbab
2016-11-10  0:56   ` Balbir Singh
2016-11-10 20:52     ` Reza Arbab
2016-11-11  1:17   ` Balbir Singh
2016-11-14 11:59   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-11-14 19:34     ` Reza Arbab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1478562276-25539-3-git-send-email-arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=apopple@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).