From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
fweimer@redhat.com, msuchanek@suse.de,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 15/22] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation to check support for pkey
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:49:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531835365-32387-16-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531835365-32387-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
pkey subsystem is supported if the hardware and kernel has support.
We determine that by checking if allocation of a key succeeds or not.
cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h | 8 ++++----
tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 9 +++++----
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h
index 321bbbd..288ccff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static inline void sigsafe_printf(const char *format, ...)
__attribute__((noinline)) int read_ptr(int *ptr);
void expected_pkey_fault(int pkey);
+int sys_pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, u64 init_val);
+int sys_pkey_free(unsigned long pkey);
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
#include "pkey-x86.h"
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h
index b0d1abe..b649e85 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h
@@ -64,9 +64,19 @@ static inline void __write_pkey_reg(pkey_reg_t pkey_reg)
pkey_reg);
}
-static inline int cpu_has_pku(void)
+static inline bool is_pkey_supported(void)
{
- return 1;
+ /*
+ * No simple way to determine this.
+ * Lets try allocating a key and see if it succeeds.
+ */
+ int ret = sys_pkey_alloc(0, 0);
+
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ sys_pkey_free(ret);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
}
static inline int arch_reserved_keys(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
index f5d0ff2..887acf2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline void __cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
#define X86_FEATURE_PKU (1<<3) /* Protection Keys for Userspace */
#define X86_FEATURE_OSPKE (1<<4) /* OS Protection Keys Enable */
-static inline int cpu_has_pku(void)
+static inline bool is_pkey_supported(void)
{
unsigned int eax;
unsigned int ebx;
@@ -118,13 +118,13 @@ static inline int cpu_has_pku(void)
if (!(ecx & X86_FEATURE_PKU)) {
dprintf2("cpu does not have PKU\n");
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
if (!(ecx & X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) {
dprintf2("cpu does not have OSPKE\n");
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
- return 1;
+ return true;
}
#define XSTATE_PKEY_BIT (9)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 18e1bb7..d27fa5e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -1389,8 +1389,8 @@ void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
int size = PAGE_SIZE;
int sret;
- if (cpu_has_pku()) {
- dprintf1("SKIP: %s: no CPU support\n", __func__);
+ if (is_pkey_supported()) {
+ dprintf1("SKIP: %s: no CPU/kernel support\n", __func__);
return;
}
@@ -1454,12 +1454,13 @@ void run_tests_once(void)
int main(void)
{
int nr_iterations = 22;
+ int pkey_supported = is_pkey_supported();
setup_handlers();
- printf("has pkey: %d\n", cpu_has_pku());
+ printf("has pkey: %s\n", pkey_supported ? "Yes" : "No");
- if (!cpu_has_pku()) {
+ if (!pkey_supported) {
int size = PAGE_SIZE;
int *ptr;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 13:49 [PATCH v14 00/22] selftests, powerpc, x86 : Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 01/22] selftests/x86: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:25 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 02/22] selftests/vm: rename all references to pkru to a generic name Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 03/22] selftests/vm: move generic definitions to header file Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:26 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 04/22] selftests/vm: move arch-specific definitions to arch-specific header Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:27 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 05/22] selftests/vm: Make gcc check arguments of sigsafe_printf() Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 06/22] selftests/vm: typecast the pkey register Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:32 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 07/22] selftests/vm: generic function to handle shadow key register Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:34 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 08/22] selftests/vm: fix the wrong assert in pkey_disable_set() Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 09/22] selftests/vm: fixed bugs in pkey_disable_clear() Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:43 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 10/22] selftests/vm: fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:45 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 11/22] selftests/vm: introduce two arch independent abstraction Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:52 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 12/22] selftests/vm: pkey register should match shadow pkey Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:00 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 13/22] selftests/vm: generic cleanup Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:06 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 14/22] selftests/vm: Introduce generic abstractions Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:38 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2018-07-18 16:42 ` [PATCH v14 15/22] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation to check support for pkey Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 16/22] selftests/vm: fix an assertion in test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 17/22] selftests/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 18/22] selftests/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 19/22] selftests/vm: detect write violation on a mapped access-denied-key page Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 20/22] selftests/vm: testcases must restore pkey-permissions Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:56 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 21/22] selftests/vm: sub-page allocator Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 22/22] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0 Ram Pai
2018-07-18 17:03 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531835365-32387-16-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).