From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A6AC070C3 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6C520659 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LoFoG0z4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D6C520659 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42YKng2BTpzDrPb for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:58:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LoFoG0z4"; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::642; helo=mail-pl1-x642.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LoFoG0z4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42YK4749NdzDrqN for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:26:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id q19-v6so5320050pll.5 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=LoFoG0z4djWfCNWrmlTfkOJ8gI3cf0TUCAFw5Ul6YGRCTrmapvDPGir/nsVK0/68+o vdipEEeCp9Yh83lLDvN0ccG+nu7bk3zBjY5ZxOyDhsOUN57h6HAJ20dtfmoRP1LjqeKz wQJdgi4L6aF57vqe/JG0FnaZYt4C7gXR6B4S17D/MVIZl7g4PcywhZwx9NmnlWwoRyJT pHh7bgr1txoXhPrgehFjL78ihE1LraMbOg7XLbTJ93LZGRFe2jSJqUxNnnbZDqAUmHS7 e0X3JHMd5V6uEaWh5XXWk+kDSzxcey7doBAAkwmrZarDZI5JfwS72DyQ+8CPqS0G0NB/ 6F3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=cSUMVa83qeg3Mwf/YziEIbrBzvnyRL9/wSIV4ziafk/8gr1BkKJaVgNYaHnvIabCzY 01z54XiWWENb6D1vTZFD9eitjM/uj2ukjoGdlq1U8zDVf3alqyFsZe1Zx0mvPKMXeIA4 wbPjzQ1EAPyf9oFsNToElvazIhD1OYDaO++XqQl7JlTovE8eHhpos8uiFHZMbPEbB9SA ByaxKbh2QWwjuNZnPPxupdKARlj+F6sfUk6xmcgEJBFR0RXTsYA1SXgWVIW2n2bazcrI pcqOca0dZK5bx/lmPrICZ5qmne/W5ON/EKO9ppmjoSfKWJjBB6bteTQMx0aPLiAu+Og6 fbHA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohZB7vCUASjc8DvOu0IRS//C2tus2Nrs8yaqg34zME2KesJI0rV mtjvIYPSnkndkV1DjFwE0z8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV618xE1lA4L3Mkze3dqIWBO1N64nQOACIO4CENbAMUAOYN+yUSXwAlElTjtEzf+S9SOmQzgvRg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:70c3:: with SMTP id l3-v6mr15376728plt.125.1539563173692; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14-v6sm11387110pgh.52.2018.10.14.17.26.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:13 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH v3 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:24:23 -0700 Message-Id: <1539563070-12969-12-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1539563070-12969-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1539563070-12969-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Multiple overlay fragments adding or deleting the same node is not supported. An attempt to do so results in an incorrect devicetree. The node name will be munged for the second add. After adding this patch, the unittest messages will show: Duplicate name in motor-1, renamed to "controller#1" OF: overlay: of_overlay_apply() err=0 ### dt-test ### of_overlay_fdt_apply() expected -22, ret=0, overlay_bad_add_dup_node ### dt-test ### FAIL of_unittest_overlay_high_level():2419 Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed ... ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 210 passed, 1 failed The incorrect (munged) node name "controller#1" can be seen in the /proc filesystem: $ pwd /proc/device-tree/testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 $ ls compatible controller controller#1 name phandle spin $ ls controller power_bus $ ls controller#1 power_bus_emergency Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 1 + .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 ++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 013d85e694c6..166dbdbfd1c5 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_12.dtb.o \ overlay_13.dtb.o \ overlay_15.dtb.o \ + overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ overlay_base.dtb.o diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..145dfc3b1024 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +/* + * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * + * Thus the new node "controller" in each fragment will + * result in an attempt to add the same node twice. + * This will result in an error and the overlay apply + * will fail. + */ + +&electric_1 { + + motor-1 { + controller { + power_bus = < 0x1 0x2 >; + }; + }; +}; + +&spin_ctrl_1 { + controller { + power_bus_emergency = < 0x101 0x102 >; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 722537e14848..471b8eb6e842 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2147,6 +2147,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_12); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); @@ -2169,6 +2170,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_12, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), {} @@ -2413,6 +2415,9 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_node", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n"); -- Frank Rowand