linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/12] x86: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:53:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547128414-50693-12-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547128414-50693-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com>

For x86 PMUs that do not support context exclusion let's advertise the
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE capability. This ensures that perf will
prevent us from handling events where any exclusion flags are set.
Let's also remove the now unnecessary check for exclusion flags.

This change means that amd/iommu and amd/uncore will now also
indicate that they do not support exclude_{hv|idle} and intel/uncore
that it does not support exclude_{guest|host}.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c    | 6 +-----
 arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c   | 7 ++-----
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 9 +--------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c
index 3210fee..7635c23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c
@@ -223,11 +223,6 @@ static int perf_iommu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* IOMMU counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */
-	if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
-	    event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (event->cpu < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -414,6 +409,7 @@ static const struct pmu iommu_pmu __initconst = {
 	.read		= perf_iommu_read,
 	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_invalid_context,
 	.attr_groups	= amd_iommu_attr_groups,
+	.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
 };
 
 static __init int init_one_iommu(unsigned int idx)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
index 398df6e..79cfd3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c
@@ -201,11 +201,6 @@ static int amd_uncore_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* NB and Last level cache counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */
-	if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
-	    event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/* and we do not enable counter overflow interrupts */
 	hwc->config = event->attr.config & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB;
 	hwc->idx = -1;
@@ -307,6 +302,7 @@ static struct pmu amd_nb_pmu = {
 	.start		= amd_uncore_start,
 	.stop		= amd_uncore_stop,
 	.read		= amd_uncore_read,
+	.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
 };
 
 static struct pmu amd_llc_pmu = {
@@ -317,6 +313,7 @@ static struct pmu amd_llc_pmu = {
 	.start		= amd_uncore_start,
 	.stop		= amd_uncore_stop,
 	.read		= amd_uncore_read,
+	.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
 };
 
 static struct amd_uncore *amd_uncore_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 27a4614..d516161 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -695,14 +695,6 @@ static int uncore_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (pmu->func_id < 0)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	/*
-	 * Uncore PMU does measure at all privilege level all the time.
-	 * So it doesn't make sense to specify any exclude bits.
-	 */
-	if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
-			event->attr.exclude_hv || event->attr.exclude_idle)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/* Sampling not supported yet */
 	if (hwc->sample_period)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -800,6 +792,7 @@ static int uncore_pmu_register(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu)
 			.stop		= uncore_pmu_event_stop,
 			.read		= uncore_pmu_event_read,
 			.module		= THIS_MODULE,
+			.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
 		};
 	} else {
 		pmu->pmu = *pmu->type->pmu;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-10 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-10 13:53 [PATCH v5 00/12] perf/core: Generalise event exclusion checking Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] perf/doc: update design.txt for exclude_{host|guest} flags Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] perf/core: add function to test for event exclusion flags Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] perf/core: add PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclusion incapable PMUs Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] alpha: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] arm: perf: conditionally use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] arm: perf/core: use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclude incapable PMUs Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] drivers/perf: " Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] drivers/perf: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] powerpc: perf/core: use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclude incapable PMUs Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] x86: " Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] perf/core: remove unused perf_flags Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1547128414-50693-12-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).