linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:00:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566376025.68ldwx3wc7.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813171018.28221-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Since BPF constant blinding is performed after the verifier pass, there
> are certain ALU32 instructions inserted which don't have a corresponding
> zext instruction inserted after. This is causing a kernel oops on
> powerpc and can be reproduced by running 'test_cgroup_storage' with
> bpf_jit_harden=2.
> 
> Fix this by emitting BPF_ZEXT during constant blinding if
> prog->aux->verifier_zext is set.
> 
> Fixes: a4b1d3c1ddf6cb ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to analysis result")
> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> This approach (the location where zext is being introduced below, in 
> particular) works for powerpc, but I am not entirely sure if this is 
> sufficient for other architectures as well. This is broken on v5.3-rc4.

Alexie, Daniel, Jiong,
Any feedback on this?

- Naveen


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-13 17:10 [RFC PATCH] bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding Naveen N. Rao
2019-08-21  8:30 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2019-08-21  9:05   ` Jiong Wang
2019-08-21 10:25 ` Regression fix for bpf in v5.3 (was Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding) Michael Ellerman
2019-08-21 10:55   ` Jiong Wang
2019-08-21 19:12     ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1566376025.68ldwx3wc7.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jiong.wang@netronome.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).