From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CBCC3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6028423774 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 07:21:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6028423774 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46L77k1kmQzDrCM for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:21:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.190; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=linyunsheng@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46L5hn2FrszDr7x for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:16:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E452DCD9497C019D9C9D; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.212.75) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:36 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips ip27 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:22 +0800 Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-9-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.67.212.75] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:11:34 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting of proximity domain is optional, as below: This optional object is used to describe proximity domain associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT). Since mips ip27 uses hub_data instead of node_to_cpumask_map, this patch checks node id with the below case before returning &hub_data(node)->h_cpus: 1. if node_id >= MAX_COMPACT_NODES, return cpu_none_mask 2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask 3. if hub_data(node) is NULL, return cpu_online_mask [1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin --- arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h index 965f079..914a55a 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h @@ -15,9 +15,18 @@ struct cpuinfo_ip27 { extern struct cpuinfo_ip27 sn_cpu_info[NR_CPUS]; #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (sn_cpu_info[(cpu)].p_nodeid) -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \ - cpu_all_mask : \ - &hub_data(node)->h_cpus) + +static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) +{ + if (node >= MAX_COMPACT_NODES) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (node < 0 || !hub_data(node)) + return cpu_online_mask; + + return &hub_data(node)->h_cpus; +} + struct pci_bus; extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *); -- 2.8.1