From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586D2C4360C for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA624217D7 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA624217D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fvn95R2XzDqHg for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:48:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fvJN4LqhzDqxQ for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:16 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fvJM1YMJz8swt for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46fvJL5v5Hz9sPk; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nayna@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fvJK5RBBz9sPq for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8RENFSQ015759 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:12 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v9kjs1ns7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:11 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:27:09 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:27:04 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8RER3uJ20185288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:03 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED406A405C; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D70A4062; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from swastik.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.207.173]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Nayna Jain To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 7/9] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:25:58 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19092714-0028-0000-0000-000003A3418B X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092714-0029-0000-0000-0000246563E6 Message-Id: <1569594360-7141-8-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-27_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909270134 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Ricther , Nayna Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Claudio Carvalho , Matthew Garret , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , Elaine Palmer , Oliver O'Halloran , George Wilson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Asymmetric private keys are used to sign multiple files. The kernel currently support checking against the blacklisted keys. However, if the public key is blacklisted, any file signed by the blacklisted key will automatically fail signature verification. We might not want to blacklist all the files signed by a particular key, but just a single file. Blacklisting the public key is not fine enough granularity. This patch adds support for blacklisting binaries with appended signatures, based on the IMA policy. Defined is a new policy option "appraise_flag=check_blacklist". Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 12 +++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 8 ++++-- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 10 ++++++-- security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index 29ebe9afdac4..4c97afcc0f3c 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Description: lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=] [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio] + [appraise_flag=[check_blacklist]] base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][CREDS_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK] [FIRMWARE_CHECK] [KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK] diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 9bf509217e8e..2c034728b239 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -254,6 +254,9 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v); #define IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC 0x40 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE +int ima_blacklist_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, int action, + int pcr, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, @@ -269,6 +272,15 @@ int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct evm_ima_xattr_data **xattr_value); #else +static inline int ima_blacklist_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, + int action, int pcr, + struct ima_template_desc + *template_desc) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 136ae4e0ee92..a5a82e870e24 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "ima.h" @@ -303,6 +304,40 @@ static int modsig_verify(enum ima_hooks func, const struct modsig *modsig, return rc; } +/* + * ima_blacklist_measurement - checks if the file measurement is blacklisted + * + * Returns -EKEYREJECTED if the hash is blacklisted. + */ +int ima_blacklist_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, int action, int pcr, + struct ima_template_desc *template_desc) +{ + enum hash_algo hash_algo; + const u8 *digest = NULL; + u32 digestsize = 0; + u32 secid; + int rc = 0; + + if (!(iint->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST)) + return 0; + + if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) { + security_task_getsecid(current, &secid); + ima_get_modsig_digest(modsig, &hash_algo, &digest, &digestsize); + + rc = is_hash_blacklisted(digest, digestsize, "bin"); + + /* Returns -EKEYREJECTED on blacklisted hash found */ + if ((rc == -EKEYREJECTED) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE)) + process_buffer_measurement(digest, digestsize, + "blacklisted-hash", pcr, + template_desc); + } + + return rc; +} + /* * ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement * diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index ae0c1bdc4eaf..92c446045637 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -336,8 +336,12 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, template_desc); if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) { inode_lock(inode); - rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig); + rc = ima_blacklist_measurement(iint, modsig, action, pcr, + template_desc); + if (rc != -EKEYREJECTED) + rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, + pathname, xattr_value, + xattr_len, modsig); inode_unlock(inode); if (!rc) rc = mmap_violation_check(func, file, &pathbuf, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 4badc4fcda98..ad3b3af69460 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ enum { Opt_fsuuid, Opt_uid_eq, Opt_euid_eq, Opt_fowner_eq, Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt, Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt, - Opt_appraise_type, Opt_permit_directio, - Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err + Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, + Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_euid_lt, "euid<%s"}, {Opt_fowner_lt, "fowner<%s"}, {Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"}, + {Opt_appraise_flag, "appraise_flag=%s"}, {Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"}, {Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"}, {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, @@ -1172,6 +1173,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) else result = -EINVAL; break; + case Opt_appraise_flag: + ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from); + if (strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist")) + entry->flags |= IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST; + break; case Opt_permit_directio: entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO; break; diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index d9323d31a3a8..73fc286834d7 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG 0x08000000 #define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS 0x10000000 #define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED 0x20000000 +#define IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST 0x40000000 #define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \ IMA_HASH | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) -- 2.20.1