From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=frIq=X3=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08034C10F14
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  2 Oct 2019 21:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E83217D7
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  2 Oct 2019 21:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 57E83217D7
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46k7rX3bB0zDqCC
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2019 07:02:52 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k7nn0rKWzDqW5
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2019 07:00:29 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1])
 by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46k7nm37N0z8v85
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2019 07:00:28 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix)
 id 46k7nm2XN5z9sPj; Thu,  3 Oct 2019 07:00:28 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com
 (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com;
 envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.156.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46k7nl5cWtz9sPc
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu,  3 Oct 2019 07:00:27 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id
 x92KpeR5042127
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:00:24 -0400
Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vd0vh4d24-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:00:24 -0400
Received: from localhost
 by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org> from <zohar@linux.ibm.com>;
 Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:00:22 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198)
 by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway:
 Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; 
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256)
 Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:00:17 +0100
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
 [9.149.105.61])
 by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 x92L0FGx50855996
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:00:15 GMT
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC16F11C050;
 Wed,  2 Oct 2019 21:00:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B3E11C06C;
 Wed,  2 Oct 2019 21:00:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-196.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.196])
 by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
 Wed,  2 Oct 2019 21:00:12 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] ima: deprecate permit_directio, instead use
 appraise_flag
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
 linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
 devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:00:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-9-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
 <1569594360-7141-9-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 19100221-0016-0000-0000-000002B372CE
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 19100221-0017-0000-0000-00003314799D
Message-Id: <1570050012.4421.50.camel@linux.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2019-10-02_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=753 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910020165
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 Eric Ricther <erichte@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
 Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@nebula.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
 Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>, Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>, Oliver
 O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>, George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

Hi Nayna,

On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 10:25 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> This patch deprecates the existing permit_directio flag, instead adds
> it as possible value to appraise_flag parameter.
> For eg.
> appraise_flag=permit_directio

Defining a generic "appraise_flag=", which supports different options,
is the right direction.  I would really like to depreciate the
"permit_directio" flag, not just change the policy syntax.  For now,
let's drop this change.

Mimi