From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=xGhR=YN=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD19CA9EAD
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293C2218BA
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 293C2218BA
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4Sh0DVJzDqMh
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:08:36 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46x4Qn45jwzDqLp
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:57 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1])
 by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4Qn2s5Hz8tT3
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:57 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix)
 id 46x4Qn2QqHz9sPV; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:57 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5;
 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.158.5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46x4Qm4ss6z9sP4
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:06:55 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id
 x9KG2ee4167682
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:06:52 -0400
Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vrg535esw-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:06:52 -0400
Received: from localhost
 by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org> from <zohar@linux.ibm.com>;
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:06:50 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195)
 by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway:
 Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; 
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256)
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:06:47 +0100
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
 [9.149.105.58])
 by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 x9KG6ja959637802
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:06:45 GMT
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7134C046;
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:06:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458B34C05A;
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.142.191])
 by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
 Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files
 with modsig
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
 linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:06:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1571508377-23603-8-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
References: <1571508377-23603-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
 <1571508377-23603-8-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 19102016-4275-0000-0000-000003748980
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 19102016-4276-0000-0000-00003887A7C6
Message-Id: <1571587602.5104.8.camel@linux.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2019-10-20_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=957 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910200162
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 Eric Ricther <erichte@linux.ibm.com>, Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
 Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@nebula.com>,
 Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
 Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>, Oliver
 O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>, George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 14:06 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Asymmetric private keys are used to sign multiple files. The kernel
> currently support checking against blacklisted keys. However, if the
> public key is blacklisted, any file signed by the blacklisted key will
> automatically fail signature verification. We might not want to blacklist
> all the files signed by a particular key, but just a single file.
> Blacklisting the public key is not fine enough granularity.
> 
> This patch adds support for checking against the blacklisted hash of the
> file based on the IMA policy. The blacklisted hash is the file hash
> without the appended signature. Defined is a new policy option
> "appraise_flag=check_blacklist".

Please add an example of how to blacklist a file with an appended
signature.  The simplest example that works on x86 as well as Power
would be blacklisting a kernel module.  The example should include
calculating the kernel module hash without the appended signature,
enabling the Kconfig option (CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST), and
the blacklist hash format (eg. "bin:<file hash>").

thanks, 

Mimi