From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8386AC43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AAB9206A3 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:42:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3AAB9206A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BKX13z52zF4cG for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:42:25 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BK4Z37cxzF3YQ for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:22:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAB5HZAT155722; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:21:51 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w70vt91sd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:21:51 -0500 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAB5HYar155526; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:21:50 -0500 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w70vt91rr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:21:50 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAB5K7gv012861; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:49 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2w5n35prwp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:49 +0000 Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.106]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xAB5LntO49021190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:49 GMT Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CAE28059; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCC828058; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltcalpine2-lp18.aus.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.40.195.201]) by b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:21:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Tyrel Datwyler To: mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/pseries: Add cpu DLPAR support for drc-info property Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:21:30 -0600 Message-Id: <1573449697-5448-4-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1573449697-5448-1-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> References: <1573449697-5448-1-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-10_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1910280000 definitions=main-1911110051 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, Tyrel Datwyler , tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Older firmwares provided information about Dynamic Reconfig Connectors (DRC) through several device tree properties, namely ibm,drc-types, ibm,drc-indexes, ibm,drc-names, and ibm,drc-power-domains. New firmwares have the ability to present this same information in a much condensed format through a device tree property called ibm,drc-info. The existing cpu DLPAR hotplug code only understands the older DRC property format when validating the drc-index of a cpu during a hotplug add. This updates those code paths to use the ibm,drc-info property, when present, instead for validation. Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c index bbda646..967c5e1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c @@ -407,17 +407,67 @@ static bool dlpar_cpu_exists(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index) return found; } +static bool drc_info_valid_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index) +{ + struct property *info; + struct of_drc_info drc; + const __be32 *value; + u32 index; + int count, i, j; + + info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL); + if (!info) + return false; + + value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count); + + /* First value of ibm,drc-info is number of drc-info records */ + if (value) + value++; + else + return false; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + if (of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc)) + return false; + + if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3)) + break; + + if (drc_index > drc.last_drc_index) + continue; + + index = drc.drc_index_start; + for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) { + if (drc_index == index) + return true; + + index += drc.sequential_inc; + } + } + + return false; +} + static bool valid_cpu_drc_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index) { bool found = false; int rc, index; - index = 0; + if (of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL)) + return drc_info_valid_index(parent, drc_index); + + /* Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is + * the number of entries in the array followed by the array + * of drc values so we start looking at index = 1. + */ + index = 1; while (!found) { u32 drc; rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes", index++, &drc); + if (rc) break; @@ -717,19 +767,52 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(u32 cpus_to_remove) return rc; } -static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add) +static int find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus, + struct property *info, + u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add) { - struct device_node *parent; + struct of_drc_info drc; + const __be32 *value; + u32 count, drc_index; int cpus_found = 0; - int index, rc; + int i, j; - parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); - if (!parent) { - pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n"); - kfree(cpu_drcs); + if (!info) return -1; + + value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count); + if (value) + value++; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc); + if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3)) + break; + + drc_index = drc.drc_index_start; + for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) { + if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index)) + continue; + + cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index; + + if (cpus_found == cpus_to_add) + return cpus_found; + + drc_index += drc.sequential_inc; + } } + return cpus_found; +} + +static int find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus, + u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add) +{ + int cpus_found = 0; + int index, rc; + u32 drc_index; + /* Search the ibm,drc-indexes array for possible CPU drcs to * add. Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is * the number of entries in the array followed by the array @@ -737,25 +820,25 @@ static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add) */ index = 1; while (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) { - u32 drc; + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(cpus, "ibm,drc-indexes", + index++, &drc_index); - rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes", - index++, &drc); if (rc) break; - if (dlpar_cpu_exists(parent, drc)) + if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index)) continue; - cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc; + cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index; } - of_node_put(parent); return cpus_found; } static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add) { + struct device_node *parent; + struct property *info; u32 *cpu_drcs; int cpus_added = 0; int cpus_found; @@ -767,7 +850,21 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add) if (!cpu_drcs) return -EINVAL; - cpus_found = find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add); + parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); + if (!parent) { + pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n"); + kfree(cpu_drcs); + return -1; + } + + info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL); + if (info) + cpus_found = find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(parent, info, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add); + else + cpus_found = find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(parent, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add); + + of_node_put(parent); + if (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) { pr_warn("Failed to find enough CPUs (%d of %d) to add\n", cpus_found, cpus_to_add); -- 2.7.4