linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/sysfs: Show idle_purr and idle_spurr for every CPU
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:22:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1580802180.jpxk9s8apz.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203045013.GC13468@in.ibm.com>

Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:23:58PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> >index 80a676d..42ade55 100644
>> >--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> >+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> >@@ -1044,6 +1044,36 @@ static ssize_t show_physical_id(struct device *dev,
>> > }
>> > static DEVICE_ATTR(physical_id, 0444, show_physical_id, NULL);
>> >
>> >+static ssize_t idle_purr_show(struct device *dev,
>> >+			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> >+{
>> >+	struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev);
>> >+	unsigned int cpuid = cpu->dev.id;
>> >+	struct lppaca *cpu_lppaca_ptr = paca_ptrs[cpuid]->lppaca_ptr;
>> >+	u64 idle_purr_cycles = be64_to_cpu(cpu_lppaca_ptr->wait_state_cycles);
>> >+
>> >+	return sprintf(buf, "%llx\n", idle_purr_cycles);
>> >+}
>> >+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(idle_purr);
>> >+
>> >+DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, idle_spurr_cycles);
>> >+static ssize_t idle_spurr_show(struct device *dev,
>> >+			       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> >+{
>> >+	struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev);
>> >+	unsigned int cpuid = cpu->dev.id;
>> >+	u64 *idle_spurr_cycles_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&idle_spurr_cycles, cpuid);
>> 
>> Is it possible for a user to read stale values if a particular cpu is in an
>> extended cede? Is it possible to use smp_call_function_single() to force the
>> cpu out of idle?
> 
> Yes, if the CPU whose idle_spurr cycle is being read is still in idle,
> then we will miss reporting the delta spurr cycles for this last
> idle-duration. Yes, we can use an smp_call_function_single(), though
> that will introduce IPI noise. How often will idle_[s]purr be read ?

Since it is possible for a cpu to go into extended cede for multiple 
seconds during which time it is possible to mis-report utilization, I 
think it is better to ensure that the sysfs interface for idle_[s]purr 
report the proper values through use of IPI.

With repect to lparstat, the read interval is user-specified and just 
gets passed onto sleep().

- Naveen


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-04  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 12:01 [PATCH 0/3] pseries: Track and expose idle PURR and SPURR ticks Gautham R. Shenoy
2019-11-27 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Account for SPURR ticks on idle CPUs Gautham R. Shenoy
2019-12-03 13:39   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2019-12-04 22:24   ` Nathan Lynch
2020-02-03  4:45     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2019-11-27 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/sysfs: Show idle_purr and idle_spurr for every CPU Gautham R. Shenoy
2019-12-03 13:37   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2019-12-04 12:37     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2019-12-03 21:02   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-04 22:24   ` Nathan Lynch
2020-02-03  4:47     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2019-12-05 16:53   ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-02-03  4:50     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-02-04  7:52       ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2020-02-05  4:19         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-02-05  6:58           ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-02-05  7:08   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-05  8:07     ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-11-27 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Document sysfs interfaces purr, spurr, idle_purr, idle_spurr Gautham R. Shenoy
2019-12-04 22:25   ` Nathan Lynch
2019-12-04 22:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] pseries: Track and expose idle PURR and SPURR ticks Nathan Lynch
2019-12-05 15:03   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2019-12-05 16:16     ` Nathan Lynch
2019-12-05 17:25       ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-12-06  9:14         ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-02-04  9:12           ` Kamalesh Babulal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1580802180.jpxk9s8apz.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).