From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ftrace: recordmcount: Handle sections with no non-weak symbols
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 23:09:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1651252324.js9790ngjg.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220428184212.18fbf438@gandalf.local.home>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:49:52 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> But, with ppc64 elf abi v1 which only supports the old -pg flag, mcount
>> location can differ between the weak and non-weak variants of a
>> function. In such scenarios, one of the two mcount entries will be
>> invalid. Such architectures need to validate mcount locations by
>> ensuring that the instruction(s) at those locations are as expected. On
>> powerpc, this can be a simple check to ensure that the instruction is a
>> 'bl'. This check can be further tightened as necessary.
>
> I was thinking about this more, and I was thinking that we could create
> another section; Perhaps __mcount_loc_weak. And place these in that
> section. That way, we could check if these symbols to see if there's
> already a symbol for it, and if there is, then drop it.
If I'm understanding your suggestion right:
- we now create a new section in each object file: __mcount_loc_weak,
and capture such relocations using weak symbols there.
- we then ask the linker to put these separately between, say,
__start_mcount_loc_weak and __stop_mcount_loc_weak
- on ftrace init, we go through entries in this range, but discard those
that belong to functions that also have an entry between
__start_mcount_loc and __stop_mcount loc.
The primary issue I see here is that the mcount locations within the new
weak section will end up being offsets from a different function in
vmlinux, since the linker does not create a symbol for the weak
functions that were over-ridden.
As an example, in the issue described in this patch set, if powerpc
starts over-riding kexec_arch_apply_relocations(), then the current weak
implementation in kexec_file.o gets carried over to the final vmlinux,
but the instructions will instead appear under the previous function in
kexec_file.o: crash_prepare_elf64_headers(). This function may or may
not be traced to begin with, so we won't be able to figure out if this
is valid or not.
- Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 17:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] ftrace/recordmcount: Handle object files without section symbols Naveen N. Rao
2022-04-28 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace: Drop duplicate mcount locations Naveen N. Rao
2022-04-28 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ftrace: recordmcount: Handle sections with no non-weak symbols Naveen N. Rao
2022-04-28 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-29 17:39 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2022-04-29 17:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-29 19:33 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-04-29 19:47 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1651252324.js9790ngjg.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).