From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Atomics support for eBPF on powerpc
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:07:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1656066254.ebcla8exs0.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Hari,
Hari Bathini wrote:
> This patchset adds atomic operations to the eBPF instruction set on
> powerpc. The instructions that are added here can be summarised with
> this list of kernel operations for ppc64:
>
> * atomic[64]_[fetch_]add
> * atomic[64]_[fetch_]and
> * atomic[64]_[fetch_]or
> * atomic[64]_[fetch_]xor
> * atomic[64]_xchg
> * atomic[64]_cmpxchg
>
> and this list of kernel operations for ppc32:
>
> * atomic_[fetch_]add
> * atomic_[fetch_]and
> * atomic_[fetch_]or
> * atomic_[fetch_]xor
> * atomic_xchg
> * atomic_cmpxchg
Thanks for your work on this. For this series:
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> The following are left out of scope for this effort:
>
> * 64 bit operations on ppc32.
> * Explicit memory barriers, 16 and 8 bit operations on both ppc32
> & ppc64.
The latter is a limitation of the eBPF instruction set itself today,
rather than a powerpc-specific limitation.
>
> The first patch adds support for bitwsie atomic operations on ppc64.
> The next patch adds fetch variant support for these instructions. The
> third patch adds support for xchg and cmpxchg atomic operations on
> ppc64. Patch #4 adds support for 32-bit atomic bitwise operations on
> ppc32. patch #5 adds support for xchg and cmpxchg atomic operations
> on ppc32.
>
> Validated these changes successfully with atomics test cases in
> test_bpf testsuite and test_verifier & test_progs selftests.
> With test_bpf testsuite:
>
> all 147 atomics related test cases (both 32-bit & 64-bit) JIT'ed
> successfully on ppc64:
>
> test_bpf: Summary: 1026 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [1014/1014 JIT'ed]
>
> all 76 atomics related test cases (32-bit) JIT'ed successfully
> on ppc32:
>
> test_bpf: Summary: 1027 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [915/1015 JIT'ed]
Indeed. In my tests, before this series, with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y:
test_bpf: Summary: 894 PASSED, 132 FAILED, [882/882 JIT'ed]
test_progs --name=atomic: Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED
test_verifier 0 100: Summary: 46 PASSED, 151 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
With your patches:
test_bpf: Summary: 1026 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [1014/1014 JIT'ed]
test_progs --name=atomic: Summary: 2/7 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
test_verifier 0 100: Summary: 101 PASSED, 96 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
It is nice to see all the test_bpf tests pass again on ppc64le!
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le)
- Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 15:55 [PATCH v2 0/5] Atomics support for eBPF on powerpc Hari Bathini
2022-06-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] bpf ppc64: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Hari Bathini
2022-06-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] bpf ppc64: add support for atomic fetch operations Hari Bathini
2022-06-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Hari Bathini
2022-06-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] bpf ppc32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Hari Bathini
2022-06-11 17:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-13 19:00 ` Hari Bathini
2022-06-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf ppc32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Hari Bathini
2022-06-11 17:34 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-13 19:11 ` Hari Bathini
2022-06-13 19:14 ` Hari Bathini
2022-06-24 10:41 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-06-24 10:37 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2022-07-04 11:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Atomics support for eBPF on powerpc Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1656066254.ebcla8exs0.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).