From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD69C4332F for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MnwMC10Qsz3c6T for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:42:31 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LnP/8+BR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LnP/8+BR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MnwL54TN2z2xyB for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:41:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29D0QQZF027777; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:07 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : subject : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : mime-version : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=mgyXLCoiiSx/Yh4HFM+raXZWjsQK3XYcd/JUJpwF8sU=; b=LnP/8+BR9uB43LXwgl12S6V8zFnoyrYpC8nR3RTawFz4fumc07FhUeXvHRQFle0H4WXi 7bhIXyeKYedeMAau4+j66tERPXvX9NFO71WQtGuR1w/s8/A8TochtKCMJ2bg3RHrJ9ly BNPt/yWHVx71GmCpRjzFLbi52Raje1qJNrygjKByDj5sE6DemmpGHL8QquK4FFCwqx3o nbGxjUexPFO5qxuVs0F1eqfFHAUPvKKtVwncU9WJ2k0iZP1LjsPE+cqTD+BxbRqSj44x wNhzf5ltvrO/+7UvhX6LlvOHXVeaq8/oPfwcJFCREdCif1twWnRf2EtQ2ZJvMbjTENxV xw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3k684jbr43-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:06 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29D3ZgmK024652; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:06 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3k684jbr3c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:06 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29D3b0hN014224; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:03 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k30u9ewt0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:03 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29D3f1OZ7275028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:01 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7952A11C04C; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB78111C04A; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.102.122]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:41:00 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:10:59 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] objtool: Enable and implement --mcount option on powerpc To: Josh Poimboeuf References: <20221002104240.1316480-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> <1665401892.qmrp2qjj9t.naveen@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20221013000548.d2m65fozzdvdsj5u@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/4d6b06ad (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1665632217.kgyce54pc4.naveen@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: hjQMm_07R5dNed5iEFJyZDHzQlcXNATv X-Proofpoint-GUID: MFeyBumg44kJLYJT8szIPsp7HQWhOgXT X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-13_02,2022-10-12_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=787 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210130020 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, chenzhongjin@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, Sathvika Vasireddy , rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, mbenes@suse.cz, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 01:20:02PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 05:19:02PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: >> > All the above changes are down to compiler optimizations and shuffling= due >> > to CONFIG_OBJTOOL being enabled and changing annotate_unreachable(). >> >=20 >> > As such, for this series: >> > Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao >> > Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao >> >=20 >> >=20 >> > Josh, >> > Are you ok if this series is taken in through the powerpc tree? >>=20 >> Yes, it looks ok to me. Let me run it through a round of testing. >=20 > The testing looked good, so: >=20 > Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf Thanks! FYI: your previous reply (that you would be testing it) didn't hit my=20 inbox and it doesn't seem to have hit the list either. - Naveen