From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Itbs=W5=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EF4C3A59B
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 06:12:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF212190F
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 06:12:03 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2DF212190F
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46MKVS4qzqzDqZH
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 16:12:00 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com
 (client-ip=45.249.212.35; helo=huawei.com;
 envelope-from=linyunsheng@huawei.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com
Received: from huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46MKRJ2RZpzDqQr
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon,  2 Sep 2019 16:09:15 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58])
 by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DA43FADD0A20B83956FB;
 Mon,  2 Sep 2019 14:09:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.74.191.121) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com
 (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 2 Sep 2019
 14:09:00 +0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for
 sparc64
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1567231103-13237-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
 <20190830.235337.570776316111294728.davem@davemloft.net>
 <0195eb73-99ae-fec2-3e11-2cb9e6677926@huawei.com>
 <20190831.130250.1236116087422472663.davem@davemloft.net>
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <1e128e33-427f-19a2-0e13-95a9c0656ab1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:08:31 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190831.130250.1236116087422472663.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.74.191.121]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
 catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
 heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
 linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
 hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
 cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
 x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
 dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
 jhogan@kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
 len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
 bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
 naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 rth@twiddle.net, axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de,
 paul.burton@mips.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
 akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On 2019/9/1 4:02, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:57:04 +0800
> 
>> Did you mean sparc64 system does not has ACPI, the device's node id will
>> not specified by ACPI, so the ACPI is unrelated here?
> 
> Yes, sparc64 never has and never will have ACPI.
> 
> This is also true for several other platforms where you have made this
> change.
> 
> The assumption of your entire patch set is that the semantics of the
> NUMA node ID are somehow completely defined by ACPI semantics.  Which
> is not true.

Thanks for pointing out.

The NUMA node id in sparc64 system is defined by DT semantics?

> 
> .
>