From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, chris.pringle@oxtel.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: PowerPC PCI DMA issues (prefetch/coherency?)
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:37:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617093654B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245197925.21602.0.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:45 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > If the
> > > > device is the only one, you can also use dma_alloc_noncoherent() and
> > > > flush explicitly with dma_cache_sync().
> > >
> > > I don't see how that would help -- aren't those also controlled by
> > > CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE?
> >
> > Ah, yes you are right. PowerPC implements dma_alloc_noncoherent as
> > dma_alloc_coherent, so dma_cache_sync() is actually a NOP (or should be).
>
> But we still need to sync the result of dma_map_* when used multiple
> times for a single mapping.
We have dma_sync_{single|sg}_for_{cpu|device} API for the above
purpose.
dma_cache_sync is supposed to be used only with the buffers that
dma_alloc_noncoherent() returns. On architecutures that maps
dma_alloc_noncoherent to dma_alloc_coherent, dma_cache_sync() is
supposed to be NOP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4A37A503.3030209@oxtel.com>
[not found] ` <20090616162114.GA5051@loki.buserror.net>
[not found] ` <4A37C97A.5050508@oxtel.com>
2009-06-16 16:46 ` PowerPC PCI DMA issues (prefetch/coherency?) Scott Wood
2009-06-16 16:57 ` Chris Pringle
2009-06-16 17:03 ` Scott Wood
2009-06-16 17:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-16 17:49 ` Scott Wood
2009-06-16 18:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-17 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-17 0:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2009-06-17 0:56 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-06-17 1:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-17 1:13 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-06-17 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-17 7:58 ` Chris Pringle
2009-06-17 13:18 ` Chris Pringle
2009-06-18 11:24 ` Chris Pringle
2009-06-22 14:31 ` AW: " Sergej.Stepanov
2009-06-29 8:11 ` Chris Pringle
2009-06-16 14:08 Chris Pringle
2009-06-16 15:48 ` Roderick Colenbrander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617093654B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chris.pringle@oxtel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).