From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu (mx3.mail.elte.hu [157.181.1.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F40B70B3 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:14:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:14:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event, powerpc: Fix compilation after big perf_counter rename Message-ID: <20090924121423.GB12262@elte.hu> References: <19128.4280.813369.589704@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1253584591.7103.197.camel@pasglop> <20090922072834.GA25470@elte.hu> <1253606415.7103.216.camel@pasglop> <1253620332.10476.4.camel@concordia> <20090923124420.GA5525@elte.hu> <1253747995.6110.5.camel@concordia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1253747995.6110.5.camel@concordia> Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 14:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 09:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nevertheless you are right that i should have caught this particular > > > > > PowerPC build bug - i missed it - sorry about that! > > > > > > > > > Allright. Well, to help in general, we are setting up a build-bot > > > > here too that will build -tip HEAD for at least powerpc daily with > > > > a few configs too. > > > > > > Results here: > > > > > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/12/ > > > > ok, seems green for today - the two failures are: one a powerpc > > toolchain problem it appears, plus a mainline warning. > > Yep that looks more or less normal. > > > Btw., for me to be able to notice failures there it would have to > > email me automatically if there's any -tip build failures that do > > not occur with the upstream branch. Does it have such a feature? > > Not really, it sends mails to me, but it doesn't have a way to filter > them by branch. I think the plan is we'll keep an eye on it and either > send you patches or at least let you know that it's broken. how many mails are those per day, typically? If there's not too many and if there's a way to send all of them to me i could post-filter them for -tip relevance. If that is feasible. You bouncing it to me later is certainly also a solution. (but lengthens the latency of fixes, obviously.) Ingo