From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jeremy.kerr@canonical.com,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] of/device: populate platform_device (of_device) resource table on allocation
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:52:43 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610165243.GA18043@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100610.100140.8559628065321695.imp@bsdimp.com>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:01:40AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
[...]
> But this requires extra, bogus fields in the structure
False. The [0] field isn't bogus, it has a defined meaning.
It says: here is some amount of resouces may be allocated.
> and creates a bogus sizeof issue.
Creates? False. The same sizeof problem exists in Grant's
approach. sizeof(*dev) != what_we_have_allocated. Which is
isn't great, I agree. And that's exactly why I proposed a
dedicated allocation in the first place.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 14:26 [PATCH 0/6] OF device code merges and improvements Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] of: Use full node name in resource structures Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] of/device: merge of_device_uevent Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] of: Modify of_device_get_modalias to be passed struct device Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] of/device: Merge of_platform_bus_probe() Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] of: Merge of_device_alloc Grant Likely
2010-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] of/device: populate platform_device (of_device) resource table on allocation Grant Likely
2010-06-08 15:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-06-08 16:02 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-08 16:46 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-06-08 18:41 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-08 19:48 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-06-10 6:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-10 14:18 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-10 15:13 ` M. Warner Losh
2010-06-10 15:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-06-10 16:01 ` M. Warner Losh
2010-06-10 16:52 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-06-10 17:09 ` Mitch Bradley
2010-06-10 17:20 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-10 17:09 ` M. Warner Losh
2010-06-11 1:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-10 16:30 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-10 17:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-06-10 17:21 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100610165243.GA18043@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).