linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
	sameo@linux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	patches@linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
	Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@freescale.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:46:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525064619.GI9774@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110525060637.GA30583@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>

Hello Shawn,

> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx25()	(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx35()	(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_mx51()	(0)
> > > +#define cpu_is_imx()	(0)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define cpu_is_imx()	(1)
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > ... e.g. that looks a bit frightening.
> > 
> Agree.
> 
> The use of cpu_is_mx..() in the driver itself seems a churn to me
> even without this consolidation patch.  Is it possible for us to
> eliminate them by using pdata, and eventually device tree?  When we
> are there, I might want to revisit the consolidation again.
An alternative that allows letting the logic in the driver and still
getting rid of the cpu_is_ stuff is using platform ids. See
drivers/spi/spi_imx.c for an example. Instead of an index into an array
(as it's for the imx-spi driver) driver_data can hold flags, too, which
should be enough most of the time.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-25  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-05 13:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers " Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:24   ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci: eliminate sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23   ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-24 19:26   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-of device drivers self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23   ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-06  2:15     ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-24 19:32   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sdhci: rename sdhci-esdhc-imx.c to sdhci-esdhc.c Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:20   ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-19  9:48   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:40   ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-25  6:06     ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25  6:46       ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-05-25  9:36         ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: sdhci: merge two sdhci-pltfm.h into one Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:13   ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: mxc: remove esdhc.h and use the public one Shawn Guo
2011-05-06  8:39   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-09  6:23     ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 16:09   ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 17:05     ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110525064619.GI9774@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=X.Xie@freescale.com \
    --cc=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mike@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=saeed@marvell.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).