linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] booke/kprobe: remove unnecessary preempt_enable_no_resched
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:25:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711055516.GA4659@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310351976-24078-2-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@windriver.com>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:39:35AM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> When enable CONFIG_PREEMPT we will trigger the following call trace:
> 
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0x10000000
> ...
> 
> krpobe always goes through the following path:
> 
> program_check_exception()
>         |
>         + notify_die(DIE_BPT, "breakpoint",...)
>                 |
>                 + kprobe_handler()
>                         |
>                         + preempt_disable();
>                         + break_handler() <- preempt_enable_no_resched()
>                         + emulate_step()
>                         + preempt_enable_no_resched()
>                         ...
>         exit
> 
> We should remove unnecessary preempt_enable_no_resched() inside of break_handler()
> since looks longjmp_break_handler() always go the above path.

The current code is correct. Reasoning follows...

setjmp_pre_handler() and longjmp_break_handler() are used only for
jprobes. In the case of a jprobe, the code flow would be:

bp hit -> kprobe_handler() -> preempt_disable() -> setjmp_pre_handler()
(not that since this routine returns 1, we skip sstep here) -> jp->entry()
-> jprobe_return() -> bp hit -> kprobe_handler() -> preempt_disable() again
-> longjmp_break_handler() -> preempt_enable() -> sstep -> preempt_enable()
(for the second kprobe_handler() entry).

You could verify this with a preempt_count() printk with a
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernel.

> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>

Nack, sorry :-)

Ananth

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-11  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-11  2:39 [v2 PATCH 1/2] booke/kprobe: make program exception to use one dedicated exception stack Tiejun Chen
2011-07-11  2:39 ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] booke/kprobe: remove unnecessary preempt_enable_no_resched Tiejun Chen
2011-07-11  2:39   ` v2 booke/kprobe: Fix stack corrupt issue when kprobe 'stwu' Tiejun Chen
2011-07-11  5:55   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2011-07-11  8:34     ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] booke/kprobe: remove unnecessary preempt_enable_no_resched tiejun.chen
2011-07-11 11:28       ` tiejun.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110711055516.GA4659@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).