linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, olof@lixom.net,
	michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc: iommu: Reduce spinlock coverage in iommu_free
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:43:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120604154344.4cadd299@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120604154213.173feecb@kryten>


This patch moves tce_free outside of the lock in iommu_free.

Some performance numbers were obtained with a Chelsio T3 adapter on
two POWER7 boxes, running a 100 session TCP round robin test.

Performance improved 25% with this patch applied.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---

Index: linux-build/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-build.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c	2012-06-04 10:38:41.461284266 +1000
+++ linux-build/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c	2012-06-04 10:38:43.813334034 +1000
@@ -190,10 +190,7 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_alloc(struct dev
 	 * not altered.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(build_fail)) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&(tbl->it_lock), flags);
 		__iommu_free(tbl, ret, npages);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(tbl->it_lock), flags);
-
 		return DMA_ERROR_CODE;
 	}
 
@@ -207,8 +204,8 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_alloc(struct dev
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void __iommu_free(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr, 
-			 unsigned int npages)
+static bool iommu_free_check(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+			     unsigned int npages)
 {
 	unsigned long entry, free_entry;
 
@@ -228,21 +225,53 @@ static void __iommu_free(struct iommu_ta
 			printk(KERN_INFO "\tindex     = 0x%llx\n", (u64)tbl->it_index);
 			WARN_ON(1);
 		}
-		return;
+
+		return false;
 	}
 
+	return true;
+}
+
+static void __iommu_free_locked(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+			 unsigned int npages)
+{
+	unsigned long entry, free_entry;
+
+	BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&tbl->it_lock));
+
+	entry = dma_addr >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT;
+	free_entry = entry - tbl->it_offset;
+
+	if (!iommu_free_check(tbl, dma_addr, npages))
+		return;
+
 	ppc_md.tce_free(tbl, entry, npages);
 	bitmap_clear(tbl->it_map, free_entry, npages);
 }
 
-static void iommu_free(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
-		unsigned int npages)
+static void __iommu_free(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+			 unsigned int npages)
 {
+	unsigned long entry, free_entry;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	entry = dma_addr >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT;
+	free_entry = entry - tbl->it_offset;
+
+	if (!iommu_free_check(tbl, dma_addr, npages))
+		return;
+
+	ppc_md.tce_free(tbl, entry, npages);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&(tbl->it_lock), flags);
-	__iommu_free(tbl, dma_addr, npages);
+	bitmap_clear(tbl->it_map, free_entry, npages);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(tbl->it_lock), flags);
+}
+
+static void iommu_free(struct iommu_table *tbl, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+		unsigned int npages)
+{
+	__iommu_free(tbl, dma_addr, npages);
 
 	/* Make sure TLB cache is flushed if the HW needs it. We do
 	 * not do an mb() here on purpose, it is not needed on any of
@@ -390,7 +419,7 @@ int iommu_map_sg(struct device *dev, str
 			vaddr = s->dma_address & IOMMU_PAGE_MASK;
 			npages = iommu_num_pages(s->dma_address, s->dma_length,
 						 IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE);
-			__iommu_free(tbl, vaddr, npages);
+			__iommu_free_locked(tbl, vaddr, npages);
 			s->dma_address = DMA_ERROR_CODE;
 			s->dma_length = 0;
 		}
@@ -425,7 +454,7 @@ void iommu_unmap_sg(struct iommu_table *
 			break;
 		npages = iommu_num_pages(dma_handle, sg->dma_length,
 					 IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE);
-		__iommu_free(tbl, dma_handle, npages);
+		__iommu_free_locked(tbl, dma_handle, npages);
 		sg = sg_next(sg);
 	}
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-04  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04  5:42 [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/pseries: Disable interrupts around IOMMU percpu data accesses Anton Blanchard
2012-06-04  5:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: iommu: Reduce spinlock coverage in iommu_alloc and iommu_free Anton Blanchard
2012-06-04  5:43 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2012-06-04  5:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: iommu: Push spinlock into iommu_range_alloc and __iommu_free Anton Blanchard
2012-06-04  5:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: iommu: Implement IOMMU pools to improve multiqueue adapter performance Anton Blanchard
2012-06-08  2:43   ` Michael Ellerman
2012-06-08  4:02     ` Anton Blanchard
2012-06-08  4:03       ` Michael Ellerman
2012-06-08  4:14     ` Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120604154344.4cadd299@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).