linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:11:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909171125.de9844579d55599c59260afb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140909190514.GE22906@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:05:14 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> 
> Update the SLUB code to search for partial slabs on the nearest node
> with memory in the presence of memoryless nodes. Additionally, do not
> consider it to be an ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH (and deactivate the slab) when
> a memoryless-node specified allocation goes off-node.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,12 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node,
>  		struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
>  {
>  	void *object;
> -	int searchnode = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_mem_id() : node;
> +	int searchnode = node;
> +
> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		searchnode = numa_mem_id();
> +	else if (!node_present_pages(node))
> +		searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);

I expect a call to node_to_mem_node() will always be preceded by a test
of node_present_pages().  Perhaps node_to_mem_node() should just do the
node_present_pages() call itself?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-10  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-09 19:01 [PATCH 0/3] Improve slab consumption with memoryless nodes Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-09 19:03 ` [PATCH v3] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-09 19:05   ` [PATCH 2/3] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-09 19:06     ` [PATCH 3/3] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 ("kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations") Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-10  0:11     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-09-10  0:55       ` [PATCH 2/3] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-10  0:11   ` [PATCH v3] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node Andrew Morton
2014-09-10  0:47     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-09-10 19:06       ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-10 22:49         ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140909171125.de9844579d55599c59260afb@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).