From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:28:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150924182817.GA11058@us.ibm.com> (raw)
>From d1171a4c34c6100ec8b663ddb803dd69ef3fb7ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
function.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/util/Build | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 349bc96..e5f18a2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ libperf-y += levenshtein.o
libperf-y += llvm-utils.o
libperf-y += parse-options.o
libperf-y += parse-events.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
libperf-y += path.o
libperf-y += rbtree.o
libperf-y += bitmap.o
@@ -103,7 +104,6 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
libperf-y += scripting-engines/
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
{
int i, idx = 0;
@@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
return 0;
}
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 2984dcc..8dbdfeb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
+#ifndef __maybe_unused
+#define __maybe_unused __attribute__((unused))
+#endif
+
struct regs_dump;
struct sample_reg {
--
1.8.3.1
reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150924182817.GA11058@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).