linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:04:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160215140408.GA22872@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455532035.26205.5.camel@ellerman.id.au>

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:27:15PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 
> There is explicit code in gcc to check whether the TOC setup is needed and only

That's undestood. The claim here is: that check is incomplete, at least.

> emit it when it's required. One case where it's *not* required is when the
> function does not TOC accesses. (See rs6000_global_entry_point_needed_p()).

n.b. I cannot find this symbol in the 4.9.3 tree, but I know what you mean.

The point here is: If you profile using "-pg", gcc perfectly recognises that
it is generating a call to "_mcount", which may be non-local, and loads the TOC.
If you use "-pg -mprofile-kernel", gcc seems to forget that, and omits the TOC
load, for a similar assembler calling sequence.

Looking at the code I can _understand_ why this is so, but my GCC knowledge
is not that deep that I could easily _fix_ this reliably.

[...]

> Secondly it means the ftrace trampoline needs to cope with being called with r2
> containing something other than the kernel TOC (ie. a module's TOC pointer).
> But I think that's solvable also?

That was the alternative I asked about; but given that the _mcount / ftrace_caller
trampoline hardly differs from a normal trampoline (so far), loading R2 would be the
general case, or an excessive special case handling would result.

I'd rather see gcc getting fixed than to have workarounds in all projects that use
it, and others agreed.

	Torsten

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-15 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-10 17:29 [PATCH v8 0/8] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE (ABI v2) Torsten Duwe
2016-01-28 15:32 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace location during build Torsten Duwe
2016-02-12 16:13   ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-12 16:45     ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-13  1:33       ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-16  5:47       ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-16  8:23         ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16 10:30           ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-16 10:39             ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16 13:57               ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-17  3:08                 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-23 17:00                   ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-24  6:37                     ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24  6:55                       ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24  9:23                         ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-24 11:22                           ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24  7:51                     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-10 16:21 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Torsten Duwe
2016-02-17 10:55   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-17 11:30     ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-17 11:39       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] ppc use ftrace_modify_all_code default Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:25 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11  7:48   ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-11  8:39     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-11  9:35       ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-11 13:00         ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11 13:00         ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11  8:42     ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11  9:34       ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-15 10:27       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-15 12:56         ` Jiri Kosina
2016-02-15 14:04         ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2016-02-15 22:21           ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16  4:53             ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-16 10:09           ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-16 10:35             ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs: disable profiling for some files Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:34 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le (ABIv2) Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11  9:01   ` Miroslav Benes
2016-02-10 16:36 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] Enable LIVEPATCH to be configured on ppc64le and add livepatch.o if it is selected Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11  6:18 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE (ABI v2) Balbir Singh
2016-02-11  8:38   ` Torsten Duwe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160215140408.GA22872@lst.de \
    --to=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).