linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	corbet@lwn.net, warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Do not Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:50:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621015045.GB30307@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464846411-16895-3-git-send-email-xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:46:49PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> Now we use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources
> in __assign_resources_sorted(). That's quite fragile. We can't
> make sure that the PCI devices' resources will not use
> IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN any more.

Can you explain this a little more?  I don't quite understand the
problem.  Maybe you can give an example of the problem?

> In this patch, we try to use a more robust way to identify
> bridge resources.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index 55641a3..216ddbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ static void __assign_resources_sorted(struct list_head *head,
>  	struct pci_dev_resource *dev_res, *tmp_res, *dev_res2;
>  	unsigned long fail_type;
>  	resource_size_t add_align, align;
> +	int index;
>  
>  	/* Check if optional add_size is there */
>  	if (!realloc_head || list_empty(realloc_head))
> @@ -410,11 +411,13 @@ static void __assign_resources_sorted(struct list_head *head,
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * There are two kinds of additional resources in the list:
> -		 * 1. bridge resource  -- IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN
> -		 * 2. SR-IOV resource   -- IORESOURCE_SIZEALIGN
> +		 * 1. bridge resource
> +		 * 2. SR-IOV resource
>  		 * Here just fix the additional alignment for bridge
>  		 */
> -		if (!(dev_res->res->flags & IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN))
> +		index = dev_res->res - dev_res->dev->resource;
> +		if (index < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES ||
> +			index > PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END)

I think the code looks OK; at least, it seems to match the comment.
I'd just like to understand the problem a little better.

>  			continue;
>  
>  		add_align = get_res_add_align(realloc_head, dev_res->res);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-21  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02  5:46 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: Add support for enforcing all MMIO BARs not to share PAGE_SIZE Yongji Xie
2016-06-02  5:46 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set Yongji Xie
2016-06-21  1:43   ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set\\ Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21  2:16     ` Yongji Xie
2016-06-21  8:38       ` Yongji Xie
2016-06-02  5:46 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Do not Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources Yongji Xie
2016-06-21  1:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-06-21  2:59     ` Yongji Xie
2016-06-02  5:46 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: Add a new option for resource_alignment to reassign alignment Yongji Xie
2016-06-21  1:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21  3:26     ` Yongji Xie
2016-06-02  5:46 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Add support for enforcing all MMIO BARs to be page aligned Yongji Xie
2016-06-21  2:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21  6:46     ` Yongji Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160621015045.GB30307@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).