From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/64s: fix POWER9 machine check handler from stop state
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:39:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216183901.28611-6-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216183901.28611-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
The ISA specifies power save wakeup can cause a machine check interrupt.
The machine check handler currently has code to handle that for POWER8,
but POWER9 crashes when trying to execute the P8 style sleep
instructions.
So queue up the machine check, then call into the idle code to wake up
as the system reset interrupt does, rather than attempting to sleep
again without going through the main idle path.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 71 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
index 5f775783f744..0388843c8d12 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
@@ -329,6 +329,35 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_common)
/* restore original r1. */ \
ld r1,GPR1(r1)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP
+EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_idle_common)
+ bl machine_check_queue_event
+ /*
+ * Queue the machine check, then reload SRR1 and use it to set
+ * CR3 according to pnv_powersave_wakeup convention.
+ */
+ ld r12,_MSR(r1)
+ rlwinm r11,r12,47-31,30,31
+ cmpwi cr3,r11,2
+
+ /*
+ * Now have to make SRR1 wake up reason look like a system reset
+ * interrupt. Put 0xf in there, which is reserved (and does not
+ * match HMI).
+ */
+ li r11,0xf
+ insrdi r12,r11,4,45
+ mtspr r12,SPRN_SRR1
+ std r12,_MSR(r1)
+
+ /*
+ * Decrement MCE nesting after finishing with the stack.
+ */
+ lhz r11,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
+ subi r11,r11,1
+ sth r11,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
+ b pnv_powersave_wakeup
+#endif
/*
* Handle machine check early in real mode. We come here with
* ME=1, MMU (IR=0 and DR=0) off and using MC emergency stack.
@@ -341,6 +370,7 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
bl machine_check_early
std r3,RESULT(r1) /* Save result */
ld r12,_MSR(r1)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP
/*
* Check if thread was in power saving mode. We come here when any
@@ -351,43 +381,14 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
*
* Go back to nap/sleep/winkle mode again if (b) is true.
*/
- rlwinm. r11,r12,47-31,30,31 /* Was it in power saving mode? */
- beq 4f /* No, it wasn't */
- /* Thread was in power saving mode. Go back to nap again. */
- cmpwi r11,2
- blt 3f
- /* Supervisor/Hypervisor state loss */
- li r0,1
- stb r0,PACA_NAPSTATELOST(r13)
-3: bl machine_check_queue_event
- MACHINE_CHECK_HANDLER_WINDUP
- GET_PACA(r13)
- ld r1,PACAR1(r13)
- /*
- * Check what idle state this CPU was in and go back to same mode
- * again.
- */
- lbz r3,PACA_THREAD_IDLE_STATE(r13)
- cmpwi r3,PNV_THREAD_NAP
- bgt 10f
- IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ(PPC_NAP)
- /* No return */
-10:
- cmpwi r3,PNV_THREAD_SLEEP
- bgt 2f
- IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ(PPC_SLEEP)
- /* No return */
-
-2:
- /*
- * Go back to winkle. Please note that this thread was woken up in
- * machine check from winkle and have not restored the per-subcore
- * state.
- */
- IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ(PPC_WINKLE)
- /* No return */
+ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ rlwinm. r11,r12,47-31,30,31
+ beq- 4f
+ BRANCH_TO_COMMON(r10, machine_check_idle_common)
4:
+ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE | CPU_FTR_ARCH_206)
#endif
+
/*
* Check if we are coming from hypervisor userspace. If yes then we
* continue in host kernel in V mode to deliver the MC event.
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 18:38 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] power saving wakeup changes for POWER9 MCE Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-16 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/64s: move remaining system reset idle code into idle_book3s.S Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-28 11:40 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-02-16 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/64: stop using bit in HSPRG0 to test winkle Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-28 15:08 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-02-28 15:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-16 18:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/64s: use alternative feature patching Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-28 15:12 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-02-16 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/64s: consolidate pnv_restore_hyp_resource into pnv_powersave_wakeup Nicholas Piggin
2017-02-28 15:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-02-16 18:39 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2017-02-28 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/64s: fix POWER9 machine check handler from stop state Gautham R Shenoy
2017-03-08 12:19 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-03-10 10:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216183901.28611-6-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).