From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K backed HPTE pages
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:54:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170914175408.GF5698@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170914114449.40446d96@firefly.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:44:49AM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:44:44 -0700
> Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Rearrange 64K PTE bits to free up bits 3, 4, 5 and 6
> > in the 64K backed HPTE pages. This along with the earlier
> > patch will entirely free up the four bits from 64K PTE.
> > The bit numbers are big-endian as defined in the ISA3.0
> >
> > This patch does the following change to 64K PTE backed
> > by 64K HPTE.
> >
> > H_PAGE_F_SECOND (S) which occupied bit 4 moves to the
> > second part of the pte to bit 60.
> > H_PAGE_F_GIX (G,I,X) which occupied bit 5, 6 and 7 also
> > moves to the second part of the pte to bit 61,
> > 62, 63, 64 respectively
> >
> > since bit 7 is now freed up, we move H_PAGE_BUSY (B) from
> > bit 9 to bit 7.
> >
> > The second part of the PTE will hold
> > (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX) at bit 60,61,62,63.
> > NOTE: None of the bits in the secondary PTE were not used
> > by 64k-HPTE backed PTE.
> >
> > Before the patch, the 64K HPTE backed 64k PTE format was
> > as follows
> >
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63
> > : : : : : : : : : : : :
> > v v v v v v v v v v v v
> >
> > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-,
> > |x|x|x| |S |G |I |X |x|B| |x|x|................|x|x|x|x| <- primary pte
> > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_'
> > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................| | | | | <- secondary pte
> > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_'
> >
> > After the patch, the 64k HPTE backed 64k PTE format is
> > as follows
> >
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10...........................63
> > : : : : : : : : : : : :
> > v v v v v v v v v v v v
> >
> > ,-,-,-,-,--,--,--,--,-,-,-,-,-,------------------,-,-,-,
> > |x|x|x| | | | |B |x| | |x|x|................|.|.|.|.| <- primary pte
> > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'_'________________'_'_'_'_'
> > | | | | | | | | | | | | |..................|S|G|I|X| <- secondary pte
> > '_'_'_'_'__'__'__'__'_'_'_'_'__________________'_'_'_'_'
> >
> > The above PTE changes is applicable to hugetlbpages aswell.
> >
> > The patch does the following code changes:
> >
> > a) moves the H_PAGE_F_SECOND and H_PAGE_F_GIX to 4k PTE
> > header since it is no more needed b the 64k PTEs.
> > b) abstracts out __real_pte() and __rpte_to_hidx() so the
> > caller need not know the bit location of the slot.
> > c) moves the slot bits to the secondary pte.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h | 3 ++
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h | 29 +++++++++++-------------
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h | 3 --
> > arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c | 23 ++++++++-----------
> > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c | 18 ++++++---------
> > 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
> > index e66bfeb..dc153c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
> > #define H_PUD_TABLE_SIZE (sizeof(pud_t) << H_PUD_INDEX_SIZE)
> > #define H_PGD_TABLE_SIZE (sizeof(pgd_t) << H_PGD_INDEX_SIZE)
> >
> > +#define H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT 56
> > +#define H_PAGE_F_SECOND _RPAGE_RSV2 /* HPTE is in 2ndary HPTEG */
> > +#define H_PAGE_F_GIX (_RPAGE_RSV3 | _RPAGE_RSV4 | _RPAGE_RPN44)
> > #define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RSV1 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
> >
> > /* PTE flags to conserve for HPTE identification */
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
> > index e038f1c..89ef5a9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-64k.h
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> > */
> > #define H_PAGE_COMBO _RPAGE_RPN0 /* this is a combo 4k page */
> > #define H_PAGE_4K_PFN _RPAGE_RPN1 /* PFN is for a single 4k page */
> > -#define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RPN42 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
> > +#define H_PAGE_BUSY _RPAGE_RPN44 /* software: PTE & hash are busy */
> >
> > /*
> > * We need to differentiate between explicit huge page and THP huge
> > @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@
> > #define H_PAGE_THP_HUGE H_PAGE_4K_PFN
> >
> > /* PTE flags to conserve for HPTE identification */
> > -#define _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS (H_PAGE_BUSY | H_PAGE_F_SECOND | \
> > - H_PAGE_F_GIX | H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_COMBO)
> > +#define _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS (H_PAGE_BUSY | H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_COMBO)
> > /*
> > * we support 16 fragments per PTE page of 64K size.
> > */
> > @@ -50,24 +49,22 @@ static inline real_pte_t __real_pte(pte_t pte, pte_t *ptep)
> > unsigned long *hidxp;
> >
> > rpte.pte = pte;
> > - rpte.hidx = 0;
> > - if (pte_val(pte) & H_PAGE_COMBO) {
> > - /*
> > - * Make sure we order the hidx load against the H_PAGE_COMBO
> > - * check. The store side ordering is done in __hash_page_4K
> > - */
> > - smp_rmb();
> > - hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
> > - rpte.hidx = *hidxp;
> > - }
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure that we do not read the hidx before we read
> > + * the pte. Because the writer side is expected
> > + * to finish writing the hidx first followed by the pte,
> > + * by using smp_wmb().
> > + * pte_set_hash_slot() ensures that.
> > + */
> > + smp_rmb();
> > + hidxp = (unsigned long *)(ptep + PTRS_PER_PTE);
> > + rpte.hidx = *hidxp;
> > return rpte;
> > }
> >
> > static inline unsigned long __rpte_to_hidx(real_pte_t rpte, unsigned long index)
> > {
> > - if ((pte_val(rpte.pte) & H_PAGE_COMBO))
> > - return (rpte.hidx >> (index<<2)) & 0xf;
> > - return (pte_val(rpte.pte) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) & 0xf;
> > + return ((rpte.hidx >> (index<<2)) & 0xfUL);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
> > index 8ce4112..46f3a23 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h
> > @@ -8,9 +8,6 @@
> > *
> > */
> > #define H_PTE_NONE_MASK _PAGE_HPTEFLAGS
> > -#define H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT 56
> > -#define H_PAGE_F_SECOND _RPAGE_RSV2 /* HPTE is in 2ndary HPTEG */
> > -#define H_PAGE_F_GIX (_RPAGE_RSV3 | _RPAGE_RSV4 | _RPAGE_RPN44)
> > #define H_PAGE_HASHPTE _RPAGE_RPN43 /* PTE has associated HPTE */
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
> > index c6c5559..9c63844 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c
> > @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ int __hash_page_4K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> > * On hash insert failure we use old pte value and we don't
> > * want slot information there if we have a insert failure.
> > */
> > - old_pte &= ~(H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_F_GIX | H_PAGE_F_SECOND);
> > - new_pte &= ~(H_PAGE_HASHPTE | H_PAGE_F_GIX | H_PAGE_F_SECOND);
> > + old_pte &= ~H_PAGE_HASHPTE;
> > + new_pte &= ~H_PAGE_HASHPTE;
>
> Shouldn't we set old/new_pte.slot = invalid? via rpte.hidx
by resetting the H_PAGE_HASHPTE flag, we are invalidating
slot information. Would that not be sufficient?
RP
>
> > goto htab_insert_hpte;
> > }
> > /*
> > @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
> > unsigned long vsid, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long trap,
> > unsigned long flags, int ssize)
> > {
> > + real_pte_t rpte;
> > unsigned long hpte_group;
> > unsigned long rflags, pa;
> > unsigned long old_pte, new_pte;
> > @@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
> > } while (!pte_xchg(ptep, __pte(old_pte), __pte(new_pte)));
> >
> > rflags = htab_convert_pte_flags(new_pte);
> > + rpte = __real_pte(__pte(old_pte), ptep);
> >
> > if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_NOEXECUTE) &&
> > !cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE))
> > @@ -270,18 +272,13 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
> >
> > vpn = hpt_vpn(ea, vsid, ssize);
> > if (unlikely(old_pte & H_PAGE_HASHPTE)) {
> > + unsigned long gslot;
> > /*
> > * There MIGHT be an HPTE for this pte
> > */
> > - hash = hpt_hash(vpn, shift, ssize);
> > - if (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_SECOND)
> > - hash = ~hash;
> > - slot = (hash & htab_hash_mask) * HPTES_PER_GROUP;
> > - slot += (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_GIX) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT;
> > -
> > - if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(slot, rflags, vpn, MMU_PAGE_64K,
> > - MMU_PAGE_64K, ssize,
> > - flags) == -1)
> > + gslot = pte_get_hash_gslot(vpn, shift, ssize, rpte, 0);
> > + if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(gslot, rflags, vpn, MMU_PAGE_64K,
> > + MMU_PAGE_64K, ssize, flags) == -1)
> > old_pte &= ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -328,9 +325,9 @@ int __hash_page_64K(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access,
> > MMU_PAGE_64K, MMU_PAGE_64K, old_pte);
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +
> > new_pte = (new_pte & ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS) | H_PAGE_HASHPTE;
> > - new_pte |= (slot << H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) &
> > - (H_PAGE_F_SECOND | H_PAGE_F_GIX);
> > + new_pte |= pte_set_hash_slot(ptep, rpte, 0, slot);
> > }
> > *ptep = __pte(new_pte & ~H_PAGE_BUSY);
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > index a84bb44..d52d667 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-hash64.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> > pte_t *ptep, unsigned long trap, unsigned long flags,
> > int ssize, unsigned int shift, unsigned int mmu_psize)
> > {
> > + real_pte_t rpte;
> > unsigned long vpn;
> > unsigned long old_pte, new_pte;
> > unsigned long rflags, pa, sz;
> > @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> > } while(!pte_xchg(ptep, __pte(old_pte), __pte(new_pte)));
> >
> > rflags = htab_convert_pte_flags(new_pte);
> > + rpte = __real_pte(__pte(old_pte), ptep);
> >
> > sz = ((1UL) << shift);
> > if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_COHERENT_ICACHE))
> > @@ -71,16 +73,11 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> > /* Check if pte already has an hpte (case 2) */
> > if (unlikely(old_pte & H_PAGE_HASHPTE)) {
> > /* There MIGHT be an HPTE for this pte */
> > - unsigned long hash, slot;
> > + unsigned long gslot;
> >
> > - hash = hpt_hash(vpn, shift, ssize);
> > - if (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_SECOND)
> > - hash = ~hash;
> > - slot = (hash & htab_hash_mask) * HPTES_PER_GROUP;
> > - slot += (old_pte & H_PAGE_F_GIX) >> H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT;
> > -
> > - if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(slot, rflags, vpn, mmu_psize,
> > - mmu_psize, ssize, flags) == -1)
> > + gslot = pte_get_hash_gslot(vpn, shift, ssize, rpte, 0);
> > + if (mmu_hash_ops.hpte_updatepp(gslot, rflags, vpn, mmu_psize,
> > + mmu_psize, ssize, flags) == -1)
> > old_pte &= ~_PAGE_HPTEFLAGS;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -106,8 +103,7 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > - new_pte |= (slot << H_PAGE_F_GIX_SHIFT) &
> > - (H_PAGE_F_SECOND | H_PAGE_F_GIX);
> > + new_pte |= pte_set_hash_slot(ptep, rpte, 0, slot);
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Balbir
--
Ram Pai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 22:44 [PATCH 0/7] powerpc: Free up RPAGE_RSV bits Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] powerpc: introduce pte_set_hash_slot() helper Ram Pai
2017-09-13 7:55 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 4:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] powerpc: introduce pte_get_hash_gslot() helper Ram Pai
2017-09-13 9:32 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-13 20:10 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 4K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai
2017-09-14 1:18 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 3:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-19 17:02 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-23 8:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 16:29 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-25 9:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-26 6:08 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K " Ram Pai
2017-09-14 1:44 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-14 17:54 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2017-09-14 18:25 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-14 8:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-10-23 8:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 23:42 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-23 19:22 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 3:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Swizzle around 4K PTE bits to free up bit 5 and bit 6 Ram Pai
2017-09-14 1:48 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-14 17:23 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] powerpc: use helper functions to get and set hash slots Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] powerpc: capture the PTE format changes in the dump pte report Ram Pai
2017-09-14 3:22 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-14 17:19 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 00/25] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 01/25] powerpc: initial pkey plumbing Ram Pai
2017-09-14 3:32 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-14 16:17 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-19 4:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-19 17:11 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 8:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 02/25] powerpc: define an additional vma bit for protection keys Ram Pai
2017-09-14 4:38 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-14 8:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-10-23 21:06 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-14 16:15 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-23 9:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 9:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 17:57 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-23 17:43 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 03/25] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys Ram Pai
2017-10-07 10:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-08 23:02 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 2:47 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-23 9:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 18:14 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 6:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-24 7:23 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 04/25] powerpc: helper function to read, write AMR, IAMR, UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-10-18 3:17 ` [PATCH 04/25] powerpc: helper function to read,write AMR,IAMR,UAMOR registers Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 3:42 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 05/25] powerpc: helper functions to initialize AMR, IAMR and UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-10-18 3:24 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 20:38 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 6:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-24 7:04 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 8:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR, iAMR when a key is allocated or freed Ram Pai
2017-10-18 3:34 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR,iAMR " Balbir Singh
2017-10-23 9:43 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR, iAMR " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 18:36 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR,iAMR " Ram Pai
2017-10-23 9:43 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR, iAMR " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-23 18:29 ` [PATCH 06/25] powerpc: cleaup AMR,iAMR " Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 07/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_set_user_pkey_access() Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 08/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_alloc() and sys_pkey_free() system calls Ram Pai
2017-10-24 15:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-24 18:34 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-25 9:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 09/25] powerpc: ability to create execute-disabled pkeys Ram Pai
2017-10-18 3:42 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 5:15 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 6:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-24 7:20 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 4:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-28 23:18 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 10/25] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-10-18 3:49 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 20:47 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:00 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 0:52 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:44 ` [PATCH 11/25] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:15 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 20:57 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:02 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 15:52 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] powerpc: ability to associate pkey to a vma Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:27 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 21:01 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:36 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 21:10 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:04 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:39 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] powerpc: map vma key-protection bits to pte key bits Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:39 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 21:14 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] powerpc: sys_pkey_mprotect() system call Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 16/25] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:43 ` Balbir Singh
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 17/25] powerpc: helper to validate key-access permissions of a pte Ram Pai
2017-10-18 4:48 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 21:19 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 18/25] powerpc: check key protection for user page access Ram Pai
2017-10-18 19:57 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-18 21:29 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:08 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:46 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 19/25] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted() Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:20 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-24 15:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 20/25] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:27 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:53 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-24 15:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-24 18:26 ` Ram Pai
2017-10-29 14:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-10-30 0:37 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 21/25] powerpc: introduce get_pte_pkey() helper Ram Pai
2017-10-18 23:29 ` Balbir Singh
2017-10-19 16:55 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 22/25] powerpc: capture the violated protection key on fault Ram Pai
2017-10-24 15:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 23/25] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-10-24 15:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-24 17:19 ` Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 24/25] powerpc/ptrace: Add memory protection key regset Ram Pai
2017-09-08 22:45 ` [PATCH 25/25] powerpc: Enable pkey subsystem Ram Pai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170914175408.GF5698@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).