From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
mhocko@kernel.org, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc, pkey: make protection key 0 less special
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 11:38:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508183853.GA5802@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180508190336.361a508b@naga.suse.cz>
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 07:03:36PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>
> How is the application denied setting the permissions on key 0 if it
> can program the register directly?
There is a UAMOR register. The userspace can change the permissions of a
given key; by modifying the bits in AMOR register, only if the kernel
has set the corresponding bit in the UAMOR register. For key-0 the
kernel does not set the corresponding UAMOR bit.
RP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-08 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 19:22 [PATCH v3] powerpc, pkey: make protection key 0 less special Ram Pai
2018-05-04 19:59 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-04 20:21 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-04 21:26 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-04 21:31 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-04 21:45 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-05 12:39 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-06 20:10 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-07 11:21 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-08 16:38 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-08 17:03 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-08 18:38 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2018-05-09 15:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-05-09 15:46 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 15:56 ` Michal Suchánek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180508183853.GA5802@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).