From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6766C04EB8 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 01:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D7D208E7 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 01:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=joelfernandes.org header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.b="dD/A+y/O" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A4D7D208E7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=joelfernandes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439wGm2kgRzDqdj for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:43:28 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=joelfernandes.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=joelfernandes.org header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.b="dD/A+y/O"; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=joelfernandes.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::432; helo=mail-pf1-x432.google.com; envelope-from=joel@joelfernandes.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=joelfernandes.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=joelfernandes.org header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.b="dD/A+y/O"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 439wD1138nzDrT8 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:41:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id c73so1071511pfe.13 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:41:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rdQMAag42WIh6sWwSVc114NUpg7aB2gq0mS9tdQMK5M=; b=dD/A+y/OaWqgJYJoRW8nOyV6X4wOp9QU8xZVE6zrZKhtHmxgfO02gM/zkhJRLTtxjc 8fdpr1hTRhdTyee9lRr+I3x3tDDUcxWM33/6gkUytGDjHj7L7J3VueV6LHH+bCeMB/CH hU0tpx5INr0qKH8YupsfKx1K041YdxaXoa0OE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rdQMAag42WIh6sWwSVc114NUpg7aB2gq0mS9tdQMK5M=; b=bG+8bS4bWQU82TgKiRg86elcJJ0LPGGaYnBlE5JbuUHr49F9lM25pK7ba4XiqSj1aD JSSy/9MCqQGRYqgjKFDQ5M9+HcCIQZiBKgNDK0LqIuRZWlZb99tKKHYJNZgxavkmfO6u HIWkpIJgRIo2L5E/QphYN+F6gSMWmdDd0169KbU+bl/whSilXEvy/HGxrywMQqqfznpy fn729p8dfc4F3+w87tESHSJ0oysogMoNdeILfsN55QtCAhklsz9bI+wNVXQt2KQ/388p ZEaeFhcVDseDvulSGRzlPmnt3hWy5NVlYMX6BLn8U4Mmlx94cW5Xulc6u3iD6uo9aN9a 30Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZDYdd9rGrB4B8GIdE718Dg8j+JCdsVuO+q7ePXMdmFc6EHCCyb 9qb7mZagRdJaxellvwGtG2B3NQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/U2dL8RZDcQsBinURn3VPAoo/B4dU/fXSeO2fsL+wbHy6pOaFMkRxB5VW5FnGwwvPLRfJIkYg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1709:: with SMTP id 9mr272611pfx.249.1544146858813; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:1601:3aef:314f:b9ea:889f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm1777232pga.68.2018.12.06.17.40.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:40:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:40:57 -0800 From: Joel Fernandes To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20181207014057.GA214249@google.com> References: <20181206174417.45fe3e7a@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181206174417.45fe3e7a@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Andrew Morton , PowerPC Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:44:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgalloc.h > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pgalloc.h > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c > > between commits: > > a95d133c8643 ("powerpc/mm: Move pte_fragment_alloc() to a common location") > 32ea4c149990 ("powerpc/mm: Extend pte_fragment functionality to PPC32") > > from the powerpc tree and commit: > > 913c2d755b39 ("mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions") > > from the akpm-current tree. > > I fixed it up (see below, plus the extra merge fix patch) and can > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. The conflict resolution looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) thanks, - Joel