linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
	Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:42:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207154255.GA28964@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y391k2tq.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2035 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:12:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:18:23AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >> 
> >> Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers, as documented
> >> in include/linux/tracehook.h,
> >> ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
> >> 
> >> Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
> >> Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: rewritten to call tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, compile-tested
> >> v3: add a descriptive comment
> >> v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
> >> 
> >>  arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > Sorry, this patch does not work, please ignore it.
> 
> Hmm OK. Why exactly?

Unfortunately, I have no idea why it doesn't work.
All I can say is it breaks strace because the kernel no longer sends
syscall entry stops.

> I wrote more or less the same patch, although I used a temporary bool.
> 
> > However, the bug blocks PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, so please fix it.
> 
> Sorry, didn't realise it was blocking you.

We are changing ptrace_report_syscall signature to implement
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO, and this is the only place in the kernel besides
tracehook_report_syscall_*() that invokes ptrace_report_syscall() directly.

> > I'm going to use
> > 	if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> > 		return -1;
> > 	return -1;
> > in the series until you have a better fix.
> 
> Yeah that's fine by me. I could send that to Linus for 4.20 if you want
> me to, otherwise I'm fine for you to carry it in your series.

Yes, please.  I'll send a v5 shortly.


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-07 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-16 11:17 [PATCH v2] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Elvira Khabirova
2018-11-16 12:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-19 21:01   ` [PATCH v3] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-11-21 21:17     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-03  3:18       ` [PATCH v4] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07  1:19         ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 11:12           ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 15:42             ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2018-12-07 15:56               ` [PATCH v5] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-07 18:52                 ` [PATCH v6] " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-10 13:28                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-10 13:36                     ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-16 17:28                       ` [PATCH] powerpc/ptrace: cleanup do_syscall_trace_enter Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:20                         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-17 11:23                           ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-17 11:27                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-22  9:54                         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:45                 ` [v5] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call Michael Ellerman
2018-12-07 16:34               ` [PATCH v4] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-07 18:42                 ` Dmitry V. Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181207154255.GA28964@altlinux.org \
    --to=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=lineprinter@altlinux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).