From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=eeko=PU=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,
	SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9168FC43387
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012A520870
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:46:36 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="Fpkw/arL"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 012A520870
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43c7yf4v6SzDr5L
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:46:34 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com
 (client-ip=156.151.31.85; helo=userp2120.oracle.com;
 envelope-from=dan.carpenter@oracle.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="Fpkw/arL"; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43c7wr1NXBzDr3Q
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:44:59 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1])
 by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0C5dk7D008181;
 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:44:48 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com;
 h=date : from : to : cc
 : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type :
 in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02;
 bh=PtaptWfC3oQXyiKNGxU7Clh59btbv0WDWxGTbbWTnWw=;
 b=Fpkw/arLU/PdAm/5jXhDtQIIYAMIzZN8623np51byJ8o0CEWBWKibzKqOsdrq0eMN0ei
 jqIm88iVV4rr9+gPaI2gORH+pPLzPwugyrt2hbRyG/ALCsWBVpBoSr74Y3y8rYovi26E
 QuY5QfI5ZqVpwdBqHZfLWOFj4524eiyaCFjtHvuk8uTg+ESQ6F887uhttPw06XwTozbA
 32mxOppokoCnD2PZyKdSCCVcsIaSMt86AfzXfJ5JOBzdeSfKauAKUIgvOCAPh74oUrGV
 za2nY70NgzZNhN/qc7v6iPC4w0ztsC2CfVuq9gqyxv4yeW17qwaNDpNW/0C5lzkQBXNe sQ== 
Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74])
 by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2py8vr02a2-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:44:48 +0000
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236])
 by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0C5igvE015525
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:44:42 GMT
Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23])
 by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0C5ibeC013076;
 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:44:37 GMT
Received: from kadam (/41.202.241.51) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
 with ESMTP ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:44:37 -0800
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:44:26 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/npu: Allocate enough memory in
 pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group()
Message-ID: <20190112054426.GF1743@kadam>
References: <20190109102328.GB5476@kadam>
 <20190112003035.GA10427@350D>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190112003035.GA10427@350D>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9133
 signatures=668680
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0
 malwarescore=0
 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999
 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901120048
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
 Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:30:35AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:23:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > There is a typo so we accidentally allocate enough memory for a pointer
> > when we wanted to allocate enough for a struct.
> > 
> > Fixes: 0bd971676e68 ("powerpc/powernv/npu: Add compound IOMMU groups")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > index d7f742ed48ba..3f58c7dbd581 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ struct iommu_table_group *pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> >  		}
> >  	} else {
> >  		/* Create a group for 1 GPU and attached NPUs for POWER8 */
> > -		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(*pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> To avoid these in the future, I wonder if instead of sizeof(pe->npucomp), we insist on
> sizeof structure
> 
> pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> 

The latest kernel fashion is sizeof(*ptr).  It can go wrong either way.
I don't have strong feelings about it.  These sorts of bugs don't last
long because they're caught in testing or with static analysis.

regards,
dan carpenter