From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88FFC282C0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70782218D0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:18:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 70782218D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43mN2n50ynzDqQB for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 02:18:41 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=catalin.marinas@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43mN0m6YhDzDqNv for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 02:16:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DDDA78; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.113]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BD5C3F5AF; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:16:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:16:42 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/29] ARM: add migrate_pages() system call Message-ID: <20190125151641.GF25901@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190118161835.2259170-7-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-7-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, deepa.kernel@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, firoz.khan@linaro.org, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The migrate_pages system call has an assigned number on all architectures > except ARM. When it got added initially in commit d80ade7b3231 ("ARM: > Fix warning: #warning syscall migrate_pages not implemented"), it was > intentionally left out based on the observation that there are no 32-bit > ARM NUMA systems. > > However, there are now arm64 NUMA machines that can in theory run 32-bit > kernels (actually enabling NUMA there would require additional work) > as well as 32-bit user space on 64-bit kernels, so that argument is no > longer very strong. > > Assigning the number lets us use the system call on 64-bit kernels as well > as providing a more consistent set of syscalls across architectures. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann For the arm64 part: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas