From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3ACC282C8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF3E2087E for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:09:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CF3E2087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43p6MW5QCSzDqGY for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:09:11 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=jolsa@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43p6Kc53gxzDqDm for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:07:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE841C004BFB; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.205.232]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C9804611D4; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:07:22 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Ravi Bangoria Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf mem/c2c: Fix perf_mem_events to support powerpc Message-ID: <20190128110722.GB15461@krava> References: <20190114041402.14033-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190114041402.14033-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:07:27 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dzickus@redhat.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, fowles@inreach.com, jmario@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:44:02AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote: SNIP > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..5b4dcfe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +#include "mem-events.h" > + > +struct perf_mem_event perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX] = { > + PERF_MEM_EVENT("ldlat-loads", "cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=%u/P", "mem-loads"), > + PERF_MEM_EVENT("ldlat-stores", "cpu/mem-stores/P", "mem-stores"), > +}; > + > +static char mem_loads_name[100]; > +static bool mem_loads_name__init; > + > +char *perf_mem_events__name(int i) > +{ > + if (i == PERF_MEM_EVENTS__LOAD) { > + if (!mem_loads_name__init) { > + mem_loads_name__init = true; > + scnprintf(mem_loads_name, sizeof(mem_loads_name), > + perf_mem_events[i].name, > + perf_mem_events__loads_ldlat); > + } > + return mem_loads_name; > + } > + > + return (char *)perf_mem_events[i].name; > +} > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > index 93f74d8..1ffefd3 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > @@ -15,31 +15,13 @@ > > unsigned int perf_mem_events__loads_ldlat = 30; > > -#define E(t, n, s) { .tag = t, .name = n, .sysfs_name = s } > - > -struct perf_mem_event perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX] = { > - E("ldlat-loads", "cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=%u/P", "mem-loads"), > - E("ldlat-stores", "cpu/mem-stores/P", "mem-stores"), > +struct perf_mem_event __weak perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX] = { > + PERF_MEM_EVENT("ldlat-loads", "cpu/mem-loads/P", "mem-loads"), > + PERF_MEM_EVENT("ldlat-stores", "cpu/mem-stores/P", "mem-stores"), > }; I dont think perf_mem_events array needs to be overloaded as well, the perf_mem_events__name function should be enough no? thanks, jirka