From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tj@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:55:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190208185515.r6vkrezbd3odhpxt@home.goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207124635.3885-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:46:29PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
> index 77740a506ebb..d5fb4f960271 100644
> --- a/include/linux/printk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/printk.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ u32 log_buf_len_get(void);
> void log_buf_vmcoreinfo_setup(void);
> void __init setup_log_buf(int early);
> __printf(1, 2) void dump_stack_set_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...);
> +__printf(1, 2) void dump_stack_add_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...);
> void dump_stack_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
> void show_regs_print_info(const char *log_lvl);
> extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold;
> @@ -256,6 +257,10 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) void dump_stack_set_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline __printf(1, 2) void dump_stack_add_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline void dump_stack_print_info(const char *log_lvl)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/lib/dump_stack.c b/lib/dump_stack.c
> index 5cff72f18c4a..69b710ff92b5 100644
> --- a/lib/dump_stack.c
> +++ b/lib/dump_stack.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,64 @@ void __init dump_stack_set_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...)
> va_end(args);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * dump_stack_add_arch_desc - add arch-specific info to show with task dumps
> + * @fmt: printf-style format string
> + * @...: arguments for the format string
> + *
> + * See dump_stack_set_arch_desc() for why you'd want to use this.
> + *
> + * This version adds to any existing string already created with either
> + * dump_stack_set_arch_desc() or dump_stack_add_arch_desc(). If there is an
> + * existing string a space will be prepended to the passed string.
> + */
> +void __init dump_stack_add_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> + va_list args;
> + int pos, len;
> + char *p;
> +
> + /*
> + * If there's an existing string we snprintf() past the end of it, and
> + * then turn the terminating NULL of the existing string into a space
> + * to create one string separated by a space.
> + *
> + * If there's no existing string we just snprintf() to the buffer, like
> + * dump_stack_set_arch_desc(), but without calling it because we'd need
> + * a varargs version.
> + */
> + len = strnlen(dump_stack_arch_desc_str, sizeof(dump_stack_arch_desc_str));
> + pos = len;
> +
> + if (len)
> + pos++;
> +
> + if (pos >= sizeof(dump_stack_arch_desc_str))
> + return; /* Ran out of space */
> +
> + p = &dump_stack_arch_desc_str[pos];
> +
> + va_start(args, fmt);
> + vsnprintf(p, sizeof(dump_stack_arch_desc_str) - pos, fmt, args);
> + va_end(args);
> +
> + if (len) {
> + /*
> + * Order the stores above in vsnprintf() vs the store of the
> + * space below which joins the two strings. Note this doesn't
> + * make the code truly race free because there is no barrier on
> + * the read side. ie. Another CPU might load the uninitialised
> + * tail of the buffer first and then the space below (rather
> + * than the NULL that was there previously), and so print the
> + * uninitialised tail. But the whole string lives in BSS so in
> + * practice it should just see NULLs.
> + */
> + smp_wmb();
This shows me that this can be called at a time when more than one CPU is
active. What happens if we have two CPUs calling dump_stack_add_arch_desc() at
the same time? Can't that corrupt the dump_stack_arch_desc_str?
-- Steve
> +
> + dump_stack_arch_desc_str[len] = ' ';
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * dump_stack_print_info - print generic debug info for dump_stack()
> * @log_lvl: log level
> --
> 2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-07 12:46 [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the dump stack arch description Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] powerpc: Add PVR & CPU name to " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] powerpc/64: Add logical PVR to the " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] powerpc: Add device-tree model to " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] powerpc: Add ppc_md.name " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc/powernv: Add opal details " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-07 12:46 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] powerpc/pseries: Add firmware " Michael Ellerman
2019-02-08 2:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dump_stack: Support adding to the " Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-08 18:55 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-02-11 7:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-11 12:50 ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-11 14:38 ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 23:39 ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-20 9:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-20 13:44 ` Andrea Parri
2019-02-21 8:38 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190208185515.r6vkrezbd3odhpxt@home.goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).