From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DE7C282CE for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72D02184E for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="sImR4AoR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D72D02184E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43z1sL6qLszDqdL for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:17:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com (client-ip=156.151.31.85; helo=userp2120.oracle.com; envelope-from=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="sImR4AoR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43z1qb4KFZzDqGS for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:15:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1BN8vX3097642; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:15:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=kB35uu3MDCX9H9dCjyeKgUX/v73vE2yZBRGVSmwnBFk=; b=sImR4AoRO04ITgZA5uD8ntFkY61H4DFWWhC82mHzH9Zl2/tm4ppiBGBzH3eGXDFAONxu GPbTUwLmNtXzS9vlCQc2DNeKtf4yohjpVNHOcZAEHr/gMpSJ0PFOUAFFar3FSj7NFbRU LDHQLdx8+c1ikyFZIbVOEf5S2XH/iEwlooItddvKSp5I2mRQbelzMicK1FOsyLZnOqFH 0VBiqzAP8poy/KL9WZYh1KxfpXW4mXA3IYj6m0bUUz00Q+bs2+7OjT5otMhuOn+DeB1S Td1dr3nTSQUyt88UnPnHUIppC6+JMHgfdf4/zPd8wIEyo+5mPUuhO9mM4PSXkz8ndTfa GQ== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2qhredru4n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:15:40 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1BNFdk6008719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:15:39 GMT Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1BNFbVA021521; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:15:37 GMT Received: from ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com (/10.211.9.48) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:15:36 -0800 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:15:57 -0500 From: Daniel Jordan To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] use pinned_vm instead of locked_vm to account pinned pages Message-ID: <20190211231557.zrcq3tv7qi6lqtvo@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> References: <20190211224437.25267-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> <20190211225447.GN24692@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190211225447.GN24692@ziepe.ca> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323-268-5a959c X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9164 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902110164 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, kvm@vger.kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Jordan , linux-mm@kvack.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mdf@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, cl@linux.com, hao.wu@intel.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:54:47PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 05:44:32PM -0500, Daniel Jordan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series converts users that account pinned pages with locked_vm to > > account with pinned_vm instead, pinned_vm being the correct counter to > > use. It's based on a similar patch I posted recently[0]. > > > > The patches are based on rdma/for-next to build on Davidlohr Bueso's > > recent conversion of pinned_vm to an atomic64_t[1]. Seems to make some > > sense for these to be routed the same way, despite lack of rdma content? > > Oy.. I'd be willing to accumulate a branch with acks to send to Linus > *separately* from RDMA to Linus, but this is very abnormal. > > Better to wait a few weeks for -rc1 and send patches through the > subsystem trees. Ok, I can do that. It did seem strange, so I made it a question...