From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
atull@kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mdf@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
cl@linux.com, hao.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] use pinned_vm instead of locked_vm to account pinned pages
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:16:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214221629.GD1739@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214214650.GB7512@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 01:46:51PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > > Really unclear how to fix this. The pinned/locked split with two
> > > > buckets may be the right way.
> > >
> > > Are you suggesting that we have 2 user limits?
> >
> > This is what RDMA has done since CL's patch.
>
> I don't understand? What is the other _user_ limit (other than
> RLIMIT_MEMLOCK)?
With todays implementation RLIMIT_MEMLOCK covers two user limits,
total number of pinned pages and total number of mlocked pages. The
two are different buckets and not summed.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 22:44 [PATCH 0/5] use pinned_vm instead of locked_vm to account pinned pages Daniel Jordan
2019-02-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfio/type1: " Daniel Jordan
2019-02-11 22:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 23:11 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-02-12 18:41 ` Alex Williamson
2019-02-13 0:26 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-02-13 20:03 ` Alex Williamson
2019-02-13 23:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-14 1:46 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-02-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfio/spapr_tce: " Daniel Jordan
2019-02-12 6:56 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-02-12 16:50 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-12 17:18 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-02-13 0:37 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-02-12 18:56 ` Alex Williamson
2019-02-13 0:34 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-02-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] fpga/dlf/afu: " Daniel Jordan
2019-02-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/mmu: " Daniel Jordan
2019-02-13 1:14 ` kbuild test robot
2019-02-11 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] kvm/book3s: " Daniel Jordan
2019-02-13 1:43 ` kbuild test robot
2019-02-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 23:15 ` Daniel Jordan
2019-02-14 1:53 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-14 6:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-14 19:33 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-14 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-14 21:46 ` Ira Weiny
2019-02-14 22:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-02-15 15:26 ` Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214221629.GD1739@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).