From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F96C282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E06206B8 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="r8eh4ERe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 99E06206B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45JQzr4BSZzDqWd for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 08:08:40 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::542; helo=mail-ed1-x542.google.com; envelope-from=richard.weiyang@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="r8eh4ERe"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45JQyK70GDzDqKw for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 08:07:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id f20so2619256edt.12 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PpKRuZzE7T8mOmzox/3fZWCQGJE/CKE/yKMFRhJ3Gf8=; b=r8eh4EReBOdbIPu4A1NNDGdXjFzs0/kcbitZHKKZAYaKNhXocwZblb/UDa/qHzpM4n H2elaGGk/e0gnNHPNwXKeHcAQnQ8whjG7luxPB1MehVQyRYd3L+0WhuLTmYgNONF0vQW /gT+d74vRjcqjUKUEja8QETsFhVds03K5SF2Vi+Gp28hsN/co8yAmDLlQo3XBDCsBx2t f10hoB3oefeCwKc/mwr3FNtMVXdQwW6jVfZhmt0IMWacdGBiHQOhNJfFHpgBzQfAMbQK Rzmp33l1qbOkzsE3obd4pS9v0hxJDLo8arS3ayyMB+ypJKFinJf8JyWlCou/md606BC2 cf8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PpKRuZzE7T8mOmzox/3fZWCQGJE/CKE/yKMFRhJ3Gf8=; b=l0WcLmPbxBgylgZebpDgvX/PnngmPK0DDRP2GnwxpK1jbnBFF48kTjnu92TB4iuMUL mx0JgLqMdyaGH+pCEBim7Tb7hoVRNLmdrRzOZz+mqQXcyZ/r6rWYaYzaG6YDOZt75OkD fU3F7xNZzWFBSOZVRiyNB/oyaMt1R3tjicBFGG/VTfQzl0C8UoSf7X5YlmWl+n/G+RX8 TdWGcWP4xsyycznhfbNjGdnk8/36165KcavR1oDz0uWlBzZuprzSPrLiwlZOd6q+WWct QZDD4F1oFAjlKydNkV1rgCIu30kDDg1CoS13DCw8amNshDvQKZFSymjKAiZVAy1xIU2G Yvjg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSLcCoSU1Hiv+TmJN9Z8+RMa0eG0uj6RjXjh7GxJZ1pJLf7R+n n2dDDQG/rgxvh2tv3uo5FxQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylJIv8N/2T6SjJp9NjY4VYtrcjtyg9w7oKoH7rUr1NCX7/8z5VGMCfO72kUy5fqWBqTC3/4A== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c3c9:: with SMTP id l9mr30726945edr.23.1559686037033; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm5036344edh.13.2019.06.04.15.07.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:07:15 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() Message-ID: <20190604220715.d4d2ctwjk25vd5sq@master> References: <20190527111152.16324-1-david@redhat.com> <20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang , linux-mm@kvack.org, Arun KS , Ingo Molnar , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Tatashin , "mike.travis@hpe.com" , Mark Brown , Jonathan Cameron , Dan Williams , Chris Wilson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador , Andrew Banman , Mathieu Malaterre , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Deucher , Igor Mammedov , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only >necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created >memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling >arch_remove_memory(). > >This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from >arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). > >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >Cc: David Hildenbrand >Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" >Cc: Andrew Morton >Cc: Andrew Banman >Cc: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Alex Deucher >Cc: "David S. Miller" >Cc: Mark Brown >Cc: Chris Wilson >Cc: Oscar Salvador >Cc: Jonathan Cameron >Cc: Michal Hocko >Cc: Pavel Tatashin >Cc: Arun KS >Cc: Mathieu Malaterre >Reviewed-by: Dan Williams >Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >--- > drivers/base/memory.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++----- > include/linux/memory.h | 2 +- > include/linux/node.h | 6 ++---- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++-- > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c >index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/memory.c >+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c >@@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > return ret; > } > >-void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) >+/* >+ * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size >+ * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices >+ * have to be offline. >+ */ >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > { >+ const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); >+ const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); > struct memory_block *mem; >+ int block_id; > >- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || >+ !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) > return; > > mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); >- >- /* >- * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to >- * track all sections. Skip over those. >- */ >- mem = find_memory_block(section); >- if (!mem) >- goto out_unlock; >- >- unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); >- >- mem->section_count--; >- if (mem->section_count == 0) >+ for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { >+ mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) >+ continue; >+ mem->section_count = 0; Is this step necessary? >+ unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem); > unregister_memory(mem); >- else >- put_device(&mem->dev); >- >-out_unlock: >+ } > mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); > } > >diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c >index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/node.c >+++ b/drivers/base/node.c >@@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) > return 0; > } > >-/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */ >-int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+/* >+ * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. >+ */ >+int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); > unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; >@@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > return -ENOMEM; > nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); > >- sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index); >- sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; >+ sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); >+ sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); > for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { > int nid; > >diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h >index db3e8567f900..f26a5417ec5d 100644 >--- a/include/linux/memory.h >+++ b/include/linux/memory.h >@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); >-extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *); >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); > extern int memory_dev_init(void); > extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); >diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h >index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644 >--- a/include/linux/node.h >+++ b/include/linux/node.h >@@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > void *arg); >-extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index); >+extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); > > extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, > unsigned int cpu_nid, >@@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > { > return 0; > } >-static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > return 0; > } >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >index 9a92549ef23b..82136c5b4c5f 100644 >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >@@ -520,8 +520,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms))) > return; > >- unregister_memory_section(ms); >- > scn_nr = __section_nr(ms); > start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr); > __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn); >@@ -1845,6 +1843,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) > memblock_free(start, size); > memblock_remove(start, size); > >+ /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */ >+ remove_memory_block_devices(start, size); >+ > arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); > __release_memory_resource(start, size); > >-- >2.20.1 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me