linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mm: Limit rma_size to 1TB when running without HV mode
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:21:03 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190710142103.GB3360@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710052018.14628-1-sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3171 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 03:20:18PM +1000, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
> The virtual real mode addressing (VRMA) mechanism is used when a
> partition is using HPT (Hash Page Table) translation and performs
> real mode accesses (MSR[IR|DR] = 0) in non-hypervisor mode. In this
> mode effective address bits 0:23 are treated as zero (i.e. the access
> is aliased to 0) and the access is performed using an implicit 1TB SLB
> entry.
> 
> The size of the RMA (Real Memory Area) is communicated to the guest as
> the size of the first memory region in the device tree. And because of
> the mechanism described above can be expected to not exceed 1TB. In the
> event that the host erroneously represents the RMA as being larger than
> 1TB, guest accesses in real mode to memory addresses above 1TB will be
> aliased down to below 1TB. This means that a memory access performed in
> real mode may differ to one performed in virtual mode for the same memory
> address, which would likely have unintended consequences.
> 
> To avoid this outcome have the guest explicitly limit the size of the
> RMA to the current maximum, which is 1TB. This means that even if the
> first memory block is larger than 1TB, only the first 1TB should be
> accessed in real mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Although I'd really like to also see some comments added in
allocate_paca_ptrs() explaining the constraints there.

Oh, also, basing this on the non-compat PVR is bogus, but it's still
better than what we had.

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> index 28ced26f2a00..4d0e2cce9cd5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> @@ -1901,11 +1901,19 @@ void hash__setup_initial_memory_limit(phys_addr_t first_memblock_base,
>  	 *
>  	 * For guests on platforms before POWER9, we clamp the it limit to 1G
>  	 * to avoid some funky things such as RTAS bugs etc...
> +	 * On POWER9 we limit to 1TB in case the host erroneously told us that
> +	 * the RMA was >1TB. Effective address bits 0:23 are treated as zero
> +	 * (meaning the access is aliased to zero i.e. addr = addr % 1TB)
> +	 * for virtual real mode addressing and so it doesn't make sense to
> +	 * have an area larger than 1TB as it can't be addressed.
>  	 */
>  	if (!early_cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)) {
>  		ppc64_rma_size = first_memblock_size;
>  		if (!early_cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>  			ppc64_rma_size = min_t(u64, ppc64_rma_size, 0x40000000);
> +		else
> +			ppc64_rma_size = min_t(u64, ppc64_rma_size,
> +					       1UL << SID_SHIFT_1T);
>  
>  		/* Finally limit subsequent allocations */
>  		memblock_set_current_limit(ppc64_rma_size);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-10  5:20 [PATCH] powerpc: mm: Limit rma_size to 1TB when running without HV mode Suraj Jitindar Singh
2019-07-10  7:32 ` Satheesh Rajendran
2019-07-10 14:21 ` David Gibson [this message]
2019-07-12 13:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-15  1:58   ` Suraj Jitindar Singh
2019-07-15  2:23     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-18 13:56 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190710142103.GB3360@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).