From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584EEC742CA for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C04D20863 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GwvBCJth" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8C04D20863 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45lcWd2CTGzDqxM for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:38:05 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=batv+957344792e76119913ac+5801+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GwvBCJth"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45lcJ24vyRzDqwT for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:28:02 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NtsbKnnxGPRRGtpsBkhigsx98hQ7c1/J+GaNPOUonEw=; b=GwvBCJthEMA2kf6sB68t63v+6 Xz+Oe8+P5a1Y5sNKIZrYG5KfZNCTAvJADgjTaPnEKmGGaf6v6FAgHhDf/LZSnVmYCnssI3zpqyF1e Hau0yzUI6C6WBXTT0GFxHd24tq7rWn9RPqLHPQes+itQqWU3bkEZT8CnW0Ffz4mLRbfDYYa2UT+Jb FmsSBG5rSS9WKAUyXoIJtnQ0c0AixTxq9Js07I40pWuEhFHpRGvwz0SyWemlQEmmZxftxFsryDhiv TPZN85lk/8zeUyI/CQc1/kk42WK4b5+l/tvl3o+CsHw9+C2BctBzTRj4ca39+Q3iTjad5jrhscxay t4OQO6Wow==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hlxSq-0004AR-88; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:28:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 08:28:00 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v4 0/4 repost] powerpc/ioda2: Yet another attempt to allow DMA masks between 32 and 59 Message-ID: <20190712152800.GC3061@infradead.org> References: <20190712094509.56695-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190712094509.56695-1-aik@ozlabs.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sam Bobroff , Alistair Popple , Oliver O'Halloran , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Gibson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:45:05PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > This is an attempt to allow DMA masks between 32..59 which are not large > enough to use either a PHB3 bypass mode or a sketchy bypass. Depending > on the max order, up to 40 is usually available. Can you elaborate what you man with supported in detail? In the end a DMA devices DMA capability is only really interesting as a lower bound. e.g. if you have a DMA that supports 40-bit DMA addressing we could always treat it as if supports 32-bit addressing, and I thought the powerpc code does that, as the DMA API now relies on that. Did I miss something and it explicitly rejected that (in which case I didn't spot the fix in this series), or is this just an optimization to handle these devices more optimally, in which case maybe the changelog could be improved a bit.