linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] powerpc/papr_scm: Update drc_pmem_unbind() to use H_SCM_UNBIND_ALL
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:43:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190723161357.26718-4-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723161357.26718-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>

The new hcall named H_SCM_UNBIND_ALL has been introduce that can
unbind all or specific scm memory assigned to an lpar. This is
more efficient than using H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM as currently we don't
support partial unbind of scm memory.

Hence this patch proposes following changes to drc_pmem_unbind():

    * Update drc_pmem_unbind() to replace hcall H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM to
      H_SCM_UNBIND_ALL.

    * Update drc_pmem_unbind() to handles cases when PHYP asks the guest
      kernel to wait for specific amount of time before retrying the
      hcall via the 'LONG_BUSY' return value.

    * Ensure appropriate error code is returned back from the function
      in case of an error.

Reviewed-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
---
Change-log:

v5:
* None. Re-spinning the patchset.

v4:
* None. Re-spinning the patchset.

v3:
* Fixed a build warning reported by kbuild-robot.
* Updated patch description to put emphasis on 'scm memory' instead of
  'scm drc memory blocks' as for phyp there is a stark difference
  between how drc are managed for scm memory v/s regular memory. [Oliver]

v2:
* Added a dev_dbg when unbind operation succeeds [Oliver]
* Changed type of variable 'rc' to int64_t [Oliver]
* Removed the code that was logging a warning in case bind operation
  takes >1-seconds [Oliver]
* Spinned off changes to hvcall.h as a separate patch. [Oliver]
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
index c8ec670ee924..82568a7e0a7c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 
 #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
 
@@ -78,22 +79,36 @@ static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
 static int drc_pmem_unbind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
 {
 	unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
-	uint64_t rc, token;
+	uint64_t token = 0;
+	int64_t rc;
 
-	token = 0;
+	dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "unbind drc %x\n", p->drc_index);
 
-	/* NB: unbind has the same retry requirements mentioned above */
+	/* NB: unbind has the same retry requirements as drc_pmem_bind() */
 	do {
-		rc = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM, ret, p->drc_index,
-				p->bound_addr, p->blocks, token);
+
+		/* Unbind of all SCM resources associated with drcIndex */
+		rc = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_UNBIND_ALL, ret, H_UNBIND_SCOPE_DRC,
+				 p->drc_index, token);
 		token = ret[0];
-		cond_resched();
+
+		/* Check if we are stalled for some time */
+		if (H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)) {
+			msleep(get_longbusy_msecs(rc));
+			rc = H_BUSY;
+		} else if (rc == H_BUSY) {
+			cond_resched();
+		}
+
 	} while (rc == H_BUSY);
 
 	if (rc)
 		dev_err(&p->pdev->dev, "unbind error: %lld\n", rc);
+	else
+		dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "unbind drc %x complete\n",
+			p->drc_index);
 
-	return !!rc;
+	return rc == H_SUCCESS ? 0 : -ENXIO;
 }
 
 static int papr_scm_meta_get(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-23 16:13 [PATCH v5 0/4] powerpc/papr_scm: Workaround for failure of drc bind after kexec Vaibhav Jain
2019-07-23 16:13 ` [DOC][PATCH v5 1/4] powerpc: Document some HCalls for Storage Class Memory Vaibhav Jain
2019-07-24  9:08   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-07-24 12:59     ` Michal Suchánek
2019-07-30  5:28       ` Vaibhav Jain
2019-07-30 12:06   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-23 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] powerpc/pseries: Update SCM hcall op-codes in hvcall.h Vaibhav Jain
2019-07-26  8:53   ` David Gibson
2019-07-30 11:26     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-23 16:13 ` Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2019-07-23 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/papr_scm: Force a scm-unbind if initial scm-bind fails Vaibhav Jain
2019-07-24  9:17   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-07-24  9:24     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-07-24  9:27       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-07-24  9:45         ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-07-24 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] powerpc/papr_scm: Workaround for failure of drc bind after kexec Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190723161357.26718-4-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).