From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1487DC0650F for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF822087F for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:16:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5EF822087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45yTsz0WzdzDqVB for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:16:39 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx1.suse.de; envelope-from=mhocko@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45yTqM23VrzDqQN for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:14:22 +1000 (AEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F32ABE9; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:14:15 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Hoan Tran OS Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA Message-ID: <20190730081415.GN9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1562887528-5896-1-git-send-email-Hoan@os.amperecomputing.com> <20190712070247.GM29483@dhcp22.suse.cz> <586ae736-a429-cf94-1520-1a94ffadad88@os.amperecomputing.com> <20190712121223.GR29483@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190712143730.au3662g4ua2tjudu@willie-the-truck> <20190712150007.GU29483@dhcp22.suse.cz> <730368c5-1711-89ae-e3ef-65418b17ddc9@os.amperecomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <730368c5-1711-89ae-e3ef-65418b17ddc9@os.amperecomputing.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Heiko Carstens , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Paul Mackerras , "H . Peter Anvin" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Alexander Duyck , Will Deacon , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "willy@infradead.org" , Mike Rapoport , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , Open Source Submission , Pavel Tatashin , Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Oscar Salvador , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "David S . Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" [Sorry for a late reply] On Mon 15-07-19 17:55:07, Hoan Tran OS wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/12/19 10:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Hmm, I thought this was selectable. But I am obviously wrong here. > > Looking more closely, it seems that this is indeed only about > > __early_pfn_to_nid and as such not something that should add a config > > symbol. This should have been called out in the changelog though. > > Yes, do you have any other comments about my patch? Not really. Just make sure to explicitly state that CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES is only about __early_pfn_to_nid and that doesn't really deserve it's own config and can be pulled under NUMA. > > Also while at it, does HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP fall into a similar > > bucket? Do we have any NUMA architecture that doesn't enable it? > > > > As I checked with arch Kconfig files, there are 2 architectures, riscv > and microblaze, do not support NUMA but enable this config. > > And 1 architecture, alpha, supports NUMA but does not enable this config. Care to have a look and clean this up please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs