linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Gavin Li <git@thegavinli.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@synopsys.com>,
	Olav Kongas <ok@artecdesign.ee>, Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] driver core: initialize a default DMA mask for platform device
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:38:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815133812.GF12036@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190815130325.GB17065@kroah.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:03:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct platform_device {
> >  	int		id;
> >  	bool		id_auto;
> >  	struct device	dev;
> > +	u64		dma_mask;
> 
> Why is the dma_mask in 'struct device' which is part of this structure,
> not sufficient here?  Shouldn't the "platform" be setting that up
> correctly already in the "archdata" type callback?

Becaus the dma_mask in struct device is a pointer that needs to point
to something, and this is the best space we can allocate for 'something'.
m68k and powerpc currently do something roughly equivalent at the moment,
while everyone else just has horrible, horrible hacks.  As mentioned in
the changelog the intent of this patch is that we treat platform devices
like any other bus, where the bus allocates the space for the dma_mask.
The long term plan is to eventually kill that weird pointer indirection
that doesn't help anyone, but for that we need to sort out the basics
first.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-11  8:05 next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] usb: don't create dma pools for HCDs with a localmem_pool Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] usb: add a hcd_uses_dma helper Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] usb: add a HCD_DMA flag instead of guestimating DMA capabilities Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-12 11:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] usb/max3421: remove the dummy {un, }map_urb_for_dma methods Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: remove is_device_dma_capable Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-11  8:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] driver core: initialize a default DMA mask for platform device Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-14 15:49   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 13:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-15 13:03   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-15 13:38     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-08-15 14:05       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-15 13:23 ` next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-15 13:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-15 14:05     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-15 14:39     ` Alan Stern
2019-08-16  6:24 next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform devices v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  6:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] driver core: initialize a default DMA mask for platform device Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:39   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815133812.GF12036@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=git@thegavinli.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ok@artecdesign.ee \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).