From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=SmZj=WM=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C7BC3A59F
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A61C20665
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4A61C20665
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469B7B0wY6zDrRd
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 04:05:10 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de
 (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469B132nBxzDr58
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:59:49 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
 id 94E9A68B05; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:59:42 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: document the choice of page attributes for
 pgprot_dmacoherent
Message-ID: <20190816175942.GA4879@lst.de>
References: <20190816070754.15653-1-hch@lst.de>
 <20190816070754.15653-7-hch@lst.de>
 <20190816173118.4rbbzuogfamfa554@willie-the-truck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190816173118.4rbbzuogfamfa554@willie-the-truck>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
 linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
 James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Mind if I tweak the second sentence to be:
> 
>   This is different from "Device-nGnR[nE]" memory which is intended for MMIO
>   and thus forbids speculation, preserves access size, requires strict
>   alignment and can also force write responses to come from the endpoint.
> 
> ? It's a small change, but it better fits with the arm64 terminology
> ("strongly ordered" is no longer used in the architecture).
> 
> If you're happy with that, I can make the change and queue this patch
> for 5.4.

I'm fine with the change, but you really need this series as base,
as there is no pgprot_dmacoherent before the series.  So I think I'll
have to queue it up if we want it for 5.4, and I'll need a few more
reviews for the other patches in this series first.