From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:24:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904002401.GA70635@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903193128.GC9749@gate.crashing.org>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:31:28PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:55:53PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:59:48AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Nathan Chancellor
> > > > Sent: 28 August 2019 19:45
> > > ...
> > > > However, I think that -fno-builtin-* would be appropriate here because
> > > > we are providing our own setjmp implementation, meaning clang should not
> > > > be trying to do anything with the builtin implementation like building a
> > > > declaration for it.
> > >
> > > Isn't implementing setjmp impossible unless you tell the compiler that
> > > you function is 'setjmp-like' ?
> >
> > No idea, PowerPC is the only architecture that does such a thing.
>
> Since setjmp can return more than once, yes, exciting things can happen
> if you do not tell the compiler about this.
>
>
> Segher
>
Fair enough so I guess we are back to just outright disabling the
warning.
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-12 2:32 [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 5:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-12 16:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 17:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-27 0:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 13:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28 17:53 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 18:01 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 18:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 22:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-29 8:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-29 9:59 ` David Laight
2019-09-03 5:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-03 19:31 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 0:24 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-09-04 8:16 ` David Laight
2019-09-04 13:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 23:15 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-10 18:30 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-10 18:37 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904002401.GA70635@archlinux-threadripper \
--to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).