linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Only dump stack once if an MMIO loop is detected
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:44:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016034426.GA19147@osmium> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016012536.22588-1-oohall@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1926 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:25:36PM +1100, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> Many drivers don't check for errors when they get a 0xFFs response from an
> MMIO load. As a result after an EEH event occurs a driver can get stuck in
> a polling loop unless it some kind of internal timeout logic.
> 
> Currently EEH tries to detect and report stuck drivers by dumping a stack
> trace after eeh_dev_check_failure() is called EEH_MAX_FAILS times on an
> already frozen PE. The value of EEH_MAX_FAILS was chosen so that a dump
> would occur every few seconds if the driver was spinning in a loop. This
> results in a lot of spurious stack traces in the kernel log.
> 
> Fix this by limiting it to printing one stack trace for each PE freeze. If
> the driver is truely stuck the kernel's hung task detector is better suited
> to reporting the probelm anyway.
problem
> 
> Cc: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>

Looks good to me (especially because if it's stuck in a loop the stack
trace is going to be pretty much the same every time). I tested it by
recovering a device that uses the mlx5_core driver.

Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index bc8a551013be..c35069294ecf 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
>  	rc = 1;
>  	if (pe->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED) {
>  		pe->check_count++;
> -		if (pe->check_count % EEH_MAX_FAILS == 0) {
> +		if (pe->check_count == EEH_MAX_FAILS) {
>  			dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
>  			if (dn)
>  				location = of_get_property(dn, "ibm,loc-code",
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-16  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-16  1:25 [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Only dump stack once if an MMIO loop is detected Oliver O'Halloran
2019-10-16  3:44 ` Sam Bobroff [this message]
2020-01-29  5:17 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191016034426.GA19147@osmium \
    --to=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).