From: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@nxp.com>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Jagadeesh Pagadala <jagdsh.linux@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.ibm.com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
Brajeswar Ghosh <brajeswar.linux@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/33] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:41:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113084137.GI2770@kitsune.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573613683.ylw9dz9mlc.astroid@bobo.none>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 01:02:34PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Michal Suchanek's on November 13, 2019 2:52 am:
> > There are numerous references to 32bit functions in generic and 64bit
> > code so ifdef them out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
>
> For the most part these seem okay to me.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > index 45f1d5e54671..35874119b398 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -44,16 +44,16 @@ CFLAGS_btext.o += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > endif
> >
> > obj-y := cputable.o ptrace.o syscalls.o \
> > - irq.o align.o signal_32.o pmc.o vdso.o \
> > + irq.o align.o signal_$(BITS).o pmc.o vdso.o \
> > process.o systbl.o idle.o \
> > signal.o sysfs.o cacheinfo.o time.o \
> > prom.o traps.o setup-common.o \
> > udbg.o misc.o io.o misc_$(BITS).o \
> > of_platform.o prom_parse.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o sys_ppc32.o \
> > - signal_64.o ptrace32.o \
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += setup_64.o \
> > paca.o nvram_64.o firmware.o note.o \
> > syscall_64.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += sys_ppc32.o ptrace32.o signal_32.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VDSO32) += vdso32/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG) += watchdog.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > index 00173cc904ef..c339a984958f 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> > @@ -52,8 +52,10 @@
> > SYS_CALL_TABLE:
> > .tc sys_call_table[TC],sys_call_table
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > COMPAT_SYS_CALL_TABLE:
> > .tc compat_sys_call_table[TC],compat_sys_call_table
> > +#endif
> >
> > /* This value is used to mark exception frames on the stack. */
> > exception_marker:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > index 60436432399f..61678cb0e6a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save();
> > struct ksignal ksig = { .sig = 0 };
> > int ret;
> > - int is32 = is_32bit_task();
> >
> > BUG_ON(tsk != current);
> >
> > @@ -277,7 +276,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >
> > rseq_signal_deliver(&ksig, tsk->thread.regs);
> >
> > - if (is32) {
> > + if (is_32bit_task()) {
> > if (ksig.ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> > ret = handle_rt_signal32(&ksig, oldset, tsk);
> > else
>
> This is just a clean up I guess.
It also expands directly to if(0) or if(1) for the !COMPAT cases. I am
not sure how it would work with the intermediate variable.
There was more complex change initially but after some additional
cleanups removing the variable is the only part left.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > index d00cfc4a39a9..319ebd4f494d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ typedef long (*syscall_fn)(long, long, long, long, long, long);
> >
> > long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8, unsigned long r0, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - unsigned long ti_flags;
> > syscall_fn f;
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S))
> > @@ -64,8 +63,7 @@ long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8,
> >
> > __hard_irq_enable();
> >
> > - ti_flags = current_thread_info()->flags;
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > + if (unlikely(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > /*
> > * We use the return value of do_syscall_trace_enter() as the
> > * syscall number. If the syscall was rejected for any reason
> > @@ -81,7 +79,7 @@ long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5, long r6, long r7, long r8,
> > /* May be faster to do array_index_nospec? */
> > barrier_nospec();
> >
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_32BIT)) {
> > + if (unlikely(is_32bit_task())) {
> > f = (void *)compat_sys_call_table[r0];
> >
> > r3 &= 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
>
> I guess this is okay, I did want to be careful about where ti_flags
> was loaded exactly, but I think DOTRACE and 32BIT are not volatile.
> Is it possible to define _TIF_32BIT to zero for 64-bit !compat case
> and have the original branch eliminated, or does that cause other
> problems?
is_32bit_task() expands to 0 or 1 constant unless CONFIG_COMPAT is set.
That's why the test needs replacing here.
Unsetting _TIF_32BIT might also be feasible but it is not necessary.
Thanks
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 16:51 [PATCH 00/33] exception cleanup, syscall in C and !COMPAT Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:51 ` [PATCH 01/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Introduce INT_DEFINE parameter block for code generation Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 02/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Add GEN_COMMON macro that uses INT_DEFINE parameters Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 03/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Add GEN_KVM " Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 04/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Expand EXC_COMMON and EXC_COMMON_ASYNC macros Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 05/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Move all interrupt handlers to new style code gen macros Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 06/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_ENTRY macro Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 07/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_COMMON macro Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 08/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Remove old INT_KVM_HANDLER Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 09/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Add ISIDE option Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 10/33] powerpc/64s/exception: move real->virt switch into the common handler Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 11/33] powerpc/64s/exception: move soft-mask test to common code Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 12/33] powerpc/64s/exception: move KVM " Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 13/33] powerpc/64s/exception: remove confusing IEARLY option Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 14/33] powerpc/64s/exception: remove the SPR saving patch code macros Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 15/33] powerpc/64s/exception: trim unused arguments from KVMTEST macro Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 16/33] powerpc/64s/exception: hdecrementer avoid touching the stack Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 17/33] powerpc/64s/exception: re-inline some handlers Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 18/33] powerpc/64s/exception: Clean up SRR specifiers Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 19/33] powerpc/64s/exception: add more comments for interrupt handlers Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 20/33] powerpc/64s/exception: only test KVM in SRR interrupts when PR KVM is supported Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 21/33] powerpc/64s/exception: soft nmi interrupt should not use ret_from_except Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 22/33] powerpc/64: system call remove non-volatile GPR save optimisation Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 23/33] powerpc/64: system call implement the bulk of the logic in C Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 24/33] powerpc/64s: interrupt return " Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 25/33] powerpc/64s/exception: remove lite interrupt return Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 26/33] powerpc: Add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 27/33] powerpc: move common register copy functions from signal_32.c to signal.c Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 28/33] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 29/33] powerpc/perf: consolidate valid_user_sp Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 30/33] powerpc/perf: remove current_is_64bit() Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 31/33] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT Michal Suchanek
2019-11-13 3:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-11-13 8:41 ` Michal Suchánek [this message]
2019-11-13 10:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 32/33] powerpc/64: Make COMPAT user-selectable disabled on littleendian by default Michal Suchanek
2019-11-12 16:52 ` [PATCH 33/33] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness Michal Suchanek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191113084137.GI2770@kitsune.suse.cz \
--to=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brajeswar.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=diana.craciun@nxp.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=firoz.khan@linaro.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gromero@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jagdsh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).