From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=/SLd=ZO=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9353C432C0
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:21:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F9020730
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:21:16 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 82F9020730
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47KDWm3Mr1zDqJl
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:21:08 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz
 (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx1.suse.de; envelope-from=jack@suse.cz;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz
Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47KDNt1ZnRzDrJw
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:15:08 +1100 (AEDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])
 by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21586B2F6;
 Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 4FA541E484C; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:15:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:15:02 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/24] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four
 routines
Message-ID: <20191122111502.GC26721@quack2.suse.cz>
References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
 <20191121071354.456618-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
 <20191121080356.GA24784@lst.de>
 <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com>
 <20191121095411.GC18190@quack2.suse.cz>
 <9d0846af-2c4f-7cda-dfcb-1f642943afea@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9d0846af-2c4f-7cda-dfcb-1f642943afea@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
 kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
 David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
 linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
 linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
 linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
 =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
 Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Thu 21-11-19 18:54:02, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 11/21/19 1:54 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 21-11-19 00:29:59, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Otherwise this looks fine and might be a worthwhile cleanup to feed
> > > > Andrew for 5.5 independent of the gut of the changes.
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the reviews! Say, it sounds like your view here is that this
> > > series should be targeted at 5.6 (not 5.5), is that what you have in mind?
> > > And get the preparatory patches (1-9, and maybe even 10-16) into 5.5?
> > 
> > One more note :) If you are going to push pin_user_pages() interfaces
> > (which I'm fine with), it would probably make sense to push also the
> > put_user_pages() -> unpin_user_pages() renaming so that that inconsistency
> > in naming does not exist in the released upstream kernel.
> > 
> > 								Honza
> 
> Yes, that's what this patch series does. But I'm not sure if "push" here
> means, "push out: defer to 5.6", "push (now) into 5.5", or "advocate for"?

I meant to include the patch in the "for 5.5" batch.

> I will note that it's not going to be easy to rename in one step, now
> that this is being split up. Because various put_user_pages()-based items
> are going into 5.5 via different maintainer trees now. Probably I'd need
> to introduce unpin_user_page() alongside put_user_page()...thoughts?

Yes, I understand that moving that patch from the end of the series would
cause fair amount of conflicts. I was hoping that you could generate the
patch with sed/Coccinelle and then rebasing what remains for 5.6 on top of
that patch should not be that painful so overall it should not be that much
work. But I may be wrong so if it proves to be too tedious, let's just
postpone the renaming to 5.6. I don't find having both unpin_user_page()
and put_user_page() a better alternative to current state. Thanks!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR