From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F096AC432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E7B20748 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:41:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 76E7B20748 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47LzW455D7zDqXv for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:41:36 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47LzSl0bSPzDqTX for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:39:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0B29A68C65; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:39:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:39:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Zigotzky Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M Message-ID: <20191125073923.GA30168@lst.de> References: <20191121072943.GA24024@lst.de> <6eec5c42-019c-a988-fc2a-cb804194683d@xenosoft.de> <20191121180226.GA3852@lst.de> <2fde79cf-875f-94e6-4a1b-f73ebb2e2c32@xenosoft.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fde79cf-875f-94e6-4a1b-f73ebb2e2c32@xenosoft.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net, rtd2@xtra.co.nz, linuxppc-dev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , paulus@samba.org, mad skateman , "contact@a-eon.com" , Robin Murphy , nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > Hello Christoph, > > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel. Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably without needing too much arch specific magic. As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday? diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r) #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0 #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL #endif phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,