From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D86CC43215 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C6A2073C for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:55:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6C6A2073C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=iogearbox.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47RL874W3DzDqQN for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:55:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=iogearbox.net (client-ip=213.133.104.62; helo=www62.your-server.de; envelope-from=daniel@iogearbox.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=iogearbox.net X-Greylist: delayed 924 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bilbo; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:53:31 AEDT Received: from www62.your-server.de (www62.your-server.de [213.133.104.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47RL634pjBzDqLY for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:53:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [194.230.159.159] (helo=localhost) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibi9Q-0004d3-Nt; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:37:52 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:37:52 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix readelf output parsing on powerpc with recent binutils Message-ID: <20191202093752.GA1535@localhost.localdomain> References: <20191201195728.4161537-1-aurelien@aurel32.net> <87zhgbe0ix.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zhgbe0ix.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.101.4/25650/Sun Dec 1 11:04:04 2019) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "open list:BPF \(Safe dynamic programs and tools\)" , Yonghong Song , "open list:BPF \(Safe dynamic programs and tools\)" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Aurelien Jarno , debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:53:26PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > On powerpc with recent versions of binutils, readelf outputs an extra > > field when dumping the symbols of an object file. For example: > > > > 35: 0000000000000838 96 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT [: 8] 1 btf_is_struct > > > > The extra "[: 8]" prevents the GLOBAL_SYM_COUNT variable to > > be computed correctly and causes the checkabi target to fail. > > > > Fix that by looking for the symbol name in the last field instead of the > > 8th one. This way it should also cope with future extra fields. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno > > --- > > tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Thanks for fixing that, it's been on my very long list of test failures > for a while. > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman Looks good & also continues to work on x86. Applied, thanks!