On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in
> > > November:

> > >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/

> > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take
> > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then.

> > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else
> > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits:

> Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of
> changes this cycle going to Linus anyway.  Any objections?

I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches.
We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the
patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody
saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches
are not applied.  The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to
take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible?